New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mark Job onPodConditions as optional in pod failure policy #120204
Mark Job onPodConditions as optional in pod failure policy #120204
Conversation
/sig apps |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: b69b85bb35232cf6cf8ba4b71d13eb033013f337
|
/label api-review |
Please cherry-pick to the first version to release as beta. |
/lgtm please pick back to previous releases that include the field |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: liggitt, mimowo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
Thanks! /lgtm |
@erikgb: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
…04-upstream-release-1.26 Automated cherry pick of #120204: Mark Job onPodConditions as optional in pod failure policy
…04-upstream-release-1.28 Automated cherry pick of #120204: Mark Job onPodConditions as optional in pod failure policy
…04-upstream-release-1.27 Automated cherry pick of #120204: Mark Job onPodConditions as optional in pod failure policy
…04-upstream-release-1.25 Automated cherry pick of #120204: Mark Job onPodConditions as optional in pod failure policy
/triage accepted |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
/kind api-change
What this PR does / why we need it:
To make onPodConditions optional, to align it with the intention reflected in the comment:
One of onExitCodes and onPodConditions, but not both, can be used in each rule.
. Also, to align the annotations with the validation code: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/master/pkg/apis/batch/validation/validation.go#L324-L329Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.: