-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 413
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
make ServiceCIDR independent in ManagedPools #4503
Conversation
/cc vishu2498 |
Probing AKS REST API, I do not see a reason to set |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4503 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 62.44% 62.44%
=======================================
Files 192 192
Lines 15379 15379
=======================================
Hits 9604 9604
Misses 5115 5115
Partials 660 660 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I may be able to push changes to original PR by the author, preserving credit to their effort. I will try that. |
Tried pushing changes to authors original PR, but couldn't.
I will close the author's original PR. |
3706be0
to
aa371bc
Compare
I was able to cherry-pick the author's changes! :) |
I think we want to update the |
ping @nawazkh on the UT, I think this PR is basically ready w/ some test coverage |
54d6716
to
9f4c836
Compare
- Service CIDR addition to AKS Cluster should be independent of DNS Service IP - add unit test for Service CIDR change
9f4c836
to
a8b8b5c
Compare
Thanks for the reminder, updated the PR. |
/lgtm /assign @mboersma @nojnhuh @willie-yao @Jont828 |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: ed0ed75e2ab59f1e0e40c519bcc531ba225ccde8
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mboersma The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/cherry-pick release-1.13 |
/cherry-pick release-1.12 |
@nawazkh: new pull request created: #4549 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@nawazkh: new pull request created: #4550 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Replaces PR #3760 since it has become stale and the user seems to be unresponsive.
Special notes for your reviewer:
TODOs:
Release note: