docs: AutoCon1 Documentation Updates

[crankynetman]

This implements all of the high priority documentation that we wanted to get done in advance of AutoCon1.

This re-uses a lot of existing docs but also adds in the following new things:

• mkdocstrings which allows us to pull in documentation from our actual code and use our docstrings and code examples instead of re-writing or copy/pasting them in our documentation.
• mkdocs-macros-plugin Allows us to add jinja (lol) templates into our docs. We can then use this to pull in examples of implementations from the example orchestrator's main branch. With this, we can show real running examples of code but not have to maintain it in two places.
• abbr Allows us to add abbreviations to mkdocs that show up anywhere that abbreviation is used as a tooltip.
• I also went ahead and added all of the skeleton files for all of the medium and low priority documentation that we want to add in the future.
  • Reminder: the full list of things we wanted docuemented is here.
• I guess I added a bunch of docs or something too.
  • Domain Models
  • Forms
  • Subscriptions (Lives on the domain model docs)
  • App.py
  • Workflow Steps
  • I cleaned up and refactored a bunch of docs along the way.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.48%. Comparing base (3fce536) to head (aee537f).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #616   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   84.48%   84.48%           
=======================================
  Files         186      186           
  Lines        9205     9206    +1     
  Branches     1539     1539           
=======================================
+ Hits         7777     7778    +1     
  Misses       1153     1153           
  Partials      275      275           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[crankynetman]

Closes #529, #532, #539, #540, #543, and #545.

[tjeerddie]

can this be linked to issues and already close some?

[crankynetman]

Thanks for the review @tjeerddie ! I think I addressed all of your comments, which are all great feedback. I think I linked the issues appropriately via this comment, but I'm not 100% sure on that.

#616 (comment)

[anieuwland]

Awesome docs, Chris, thanks! I updated the branch with a couple of small typo fixes, hope you don't mind. I thought it'd be more efficient than going back and forth between the two of us.