Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-19.0] fix: handle info_schema routing (#15899) #15906

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 9, 2024

Conversation

vitess-bot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@vitess-bot vitess-bot bot commented May 9, 2024

Description

This is a backport of #15899

Signed-off-by: Andres Taylor <andres@planetscale.com>
Copy link
Contributor Author

vitess-bot bot commented May 9, 2024

Review Checklist

Hello reviewers! 👋 Please follow this checklist when reviewing this Pull Request.

General

  • Ensure that the Pull Request has a descriptive title.
  • Ensure there is a link to an issue (except for internal cleanup and flaky test fixes), new features should have an RFC that documents use cases and test cases.

Tests

  • Bug fixes should have at least one unit or end-to-end test, enhancement and new features should have a sufficient number of tests.

Documentation

  • Apply the release notes (needs details) label if users need to know about this change.
  • New features should be documented.
  • There should be some code comments as to why things are implemented the way they are.
  • There should be a comment at the top of each new or modified test to explain what the test does.

New flags

  • Is this flag really necessary?
  • Flag names must be clear and intuitive, use dashes (-), and have a clear help text.

If a workflow is added or modified:

  • Each item in Jobs should be named in order to mark it as required.
  • If the workflow needs to be marked as required, the maintainer team must be notified.

Backward compatibility

  • Protobuf changes should be wire-compatible.
  • Changes to _vt tables and RPCs need to be backward compatible.
  • RPC changes should be compatible with vitess-operator
  • If a flag is removed, then it should also be removed from vitess-operator and arewefastyet, if used there.
  • vtctl command output order should be stable and awk-able.

@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v19.0.5 milestone May 9, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 9, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 78.94737% with 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 67.48%. Comparing base (5a5975e) to head (e447733).

Files Patch % Lines
go/vt/vtgate/planbuilder/vexplain.go 78.94% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-19.0   #15906      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         67.45%   67.48%   +0.02%     
================================================
  Files              1560     1560              
  Lines            192812   192822      +10     
================================================
+ Hits             130055   130117      +62     
+ Misses            62757    62705      -52     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@frouioui frouioui merged commit 2eaf6d1 into release-19.0 May 9, 2024
203 checks passed
@frouioui frouioui deleted the backport-15899-to-release-19.0 branch May 9, 2024 20:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants