feat(eslint-plugin-internal): add internal lint rule no-relative-paths-to-internal-packages

[kirkwaiblinger]

PR Checklist

• Addresses an existing open issue: fixes Repo: Internal linter rule for absolute imports from eslint packages #8345
• That issue was marked as accepting prs
• Steps in Contributing were taken

Overview

Adds internal lint rule to look for flag relative imports that import code from other packages.

Found no existing violations! :)

[typescript-eslint]

Thanks for the PR, @kirkwaiblinger!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!

---

🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	e73995d
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/65e67828023cd5000877d3e0
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-8596--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 99 (🟢 up 9 from production) Accessibility: 100 (no change from production) Best Practices: 92 (no change from production) SEO: 98 (no change from production) PWA: 80 (no change from production) View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit e73995d. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

🟥 Failed Commands
nx run integration-tests:test

✅ Successfully ran 30 targets

• nx test visitor-keys
• nx run types:build
• nx test typescript-eslint
• nx test typescript-estree
• nx test utils
• nx run repo-tools:postinstall-script
• nx test type-utils
• nx test scope-manager
• nx test eslint-plugin-internal
• nx test rule-schema-to-typescript-types
• nx run-many --target=build --parallel --exclude=website --exclude=website-eslint
• nx test repo-tools
• nx test parser
• nx test eslint-plugin
• nx test ast-spec
• nx run-many --target=lint --parallel --exclude eslint-plugin
• nx run-many --target=typecheck --parallel
• nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false
• nx test rule-schema-to-typescript-types --coverage=false
• nx test scope-manager --coverage=false
• nx test repo-tools --coverage=false
• nx test type-utils --coverage=false
• nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false
• nx test parser --coverage=false
• nx test ast-spec --coverage=false
• nx test typescript-eslint --coverage=false
• nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false
• nx test utils --coverage=false
• nx test visitor-keys --coverage=false
• nx run repo-tools:generate-configs

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[kirkwaiblinger]

tried to import this from /packages/repo-tools/src/paths.mts but ts was upset about some module stuff that I didn't really understand.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.14%. Comparing base (6954a4a) to head (e73995d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8596      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.12%   87.14%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         251      252       +1     
  Lines       12268    12287      +19     
  Branches     3868     3871       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits        10689    10708      +19     
  Misses       1307     1307              
  Partials      272      272              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittest	87.14% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files	Coverage Δ
...rc/rules/no-relative-paths-to-internal-packages.ts	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

[kirkwaiblinger]

Not sure about the CI failure, but it appears to be failing on other recent PRs as well

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

Yeah, the integration tests are unrelated. This is great - thanks!