feat: add ignoredTypeNames option for restrict-template-expressions

[abrahamguo]

PR Checklist

• Addresses an existing open issue: fixes Enhancement: [restrict-template-expressions] More permissive type check #6279
• That issue was marked as accepting prs
• Steps in Contributing were taken

Overview

Building on the work from #8389, which @JoshuaKGoldberg has been reviewing, this PR ports the ignoredTypeNames option from no-base-to-string into restrict-template-expressions. I'm open to further discussion about this, as this update definitely blurs the line between the two rules.

[typescript-eslint]

Thanks for the PR, @abrahamguo!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!

---

🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	f5396c6
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/65f5a3a51a7496000895e4f7
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-8556--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse	1 paths audited Performance: 87 (🔴 down 6 from production) Accessibility: 100 (no change from production) Best Practices: 92 (no change from production) SEO: 98 (no change from production) PWA: 80 (no change from production) View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[nx-cloud]

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit f5396c6. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

---

🟥 Failed Commands
nx test eslint-plugin --coverage=false

✅ Successfully ran 29 targets

• nx test visitor-keys
• nx test utils
• nx run types:build
• nx run repo-tools:postinstall-script
• nx test typescript-eslint
• nx test type-utils
• nx test typescript-estree
• nx test scope-manager
• nx test repo-tools
• nx test rule-schema-to-typescript-types
• nx test ast-spec
• nx run-many --target=build --parallel --exclude=website --exclude=website-eslint
• nx test eslint-plugin-internal
• nx test parser
• nx run-many --target=lint --parallel --exclude eslint-plugin
• nx run-many --target=typecheck --parallel
• nx test visitor-keys --coverage=false
• nx test typescript-estree --coverage=false
• nx test rule-schema-to-typescript-types --coverage=false
• nx run integration-tests:test
• nx test typescript-eslint --coverage=false
• nx test utils --coverage=false
• nx test repo-tools --coverage=false
• nx test ast-spec --coverage=false
• nx test eslint-plugin-internal --coverage=false
• nx test scope-manager --coverage=false
• nx test type-utils --coverage=false
• nx test parser --coverage=false
• nx run repo-tools:generate-configs

---

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

Thanks for sending this in - but would you be open to filing an issue? I think we'd want to discuss this a bit before landing it.

Also, just a couple preliminary review thoughts if it does land:

• Unit tests?
• I think we'd want to share the default value of ignoredTypeNames in a constant so it doesn't risk getting out of sync

[JoshuaKGoldberg]

Marking as a draft pending #8722's resolution.