Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(eslint-plugin): [prefer-readonly] disable checking accessors #8300

Merged

Conversation

Jamesernator
Copy link
Contributor

@Jamesernator Jamesernator commented Jan 25, 2024

PR Checklist

Overview

Accessors don't support readonly, so having prefer-readonly apply to them doesn't make sense. The current behaviour also generates an invalid fix, as such this PR simply removes accessors from being considered in the rule.

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @Jamesernator!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 25, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 64267cd
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/65b7d5d9e32c1f00082ccc34
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-8300--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 96 (🟢 up 6 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 98 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for the quick fix, thanks! Your instincts were right in sending this PR along with the issue 😄 appreciated.

I've set a reminder for myself to apply the test splitup if you don't see it + have time before our Monday release.

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg added the awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party label Jan 28, 2024
@Jamesernator Jamesernator changed the title Disable checking accessors for prefer-readonly [fix] Disable checking accessors for prefer-readonly Jan 28, 2024
@Jamesernator Jamesernator changed the title [fix] Disable checking accessors for prefer-readonly fix: Disable checking accessors for prefer-readonly Jan 28, 2024
@Jamesernator Jamesernator changed the title fix: Disable checking accessors for prefer-readonly fix: [prefer-readonly] disable checking accessors Jan 28, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg changed the title fix: [prefer-readonly] disable checking accessors fix(eslint-plugin): [prefer-readonly] disable checking accessors Jan 29, 2024
Copy link
Member

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯 thanks!

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg merged commit 4d2ce3b into typescript-eslint:main Jan 29, 2024
53 of 55 checks passed
danvk pushed a commit to danvk/typescript-eslint that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2024
…escript-eslint#8300)

* Disable checking accessors for prefer-readonly

* Granular accessor tests

* Update packages/eslint-plugin/src/rules/prefer-readonly.ts

* fix: formatting and || for isModifierFlagSet suggestion

---------

Co-authored-by: Josh Goldberg ✨ <git@joshuakgoldberg.com>
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
awaiting response Issues waiting for a reply from the OP or another party
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bug: [prefer-readonly] prefer-readonly should not consider accessors
2 participants