Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Furo docs theme with styling #23159

Merged
merged 56 commits into from Apr 7, 2022
Merged

Conversation

asmeurer
Copy link
Member

@asmeurer asmeurer commented Feb 24, 2022

References to other Issues or PRs

This is based off of #22864, but I've updated the styling of the Furo theme. This is not at all finished yet, and we also haven't formally decided to switch to Furo yet either.

Demo site here: https://www.asmeurer.com/sympy-furo-demo/

Brief description of what is fixed or changed

I've done a lot of styling, but there are still things that can be improved. Please build the docs and play around with it. If you find something that is low contrast or the wrong color, it probably means it is something I didn't notice.

Also please try both the light and dark theme (you can click the icon at the top of the page).

I haven't changed any fonts or font sizes, except for the code examples. It's a possibility to do this, but I'd like feedback.

CC @bertiewooster

Other comments

TODOs

  • Check if fonts should be adjusted (different fonts, sizes, etc.)
  • Add a version selector to the sidebar
  • Adjust the logo size on mobile (or alternately, make the whole sidebar scrollable)
  • Fix all remaining contrast issues
  • Remove all text referencing SymPy Live

Release Notes

  • other
    • The documentation now uses the Furo Sphinx theme.

@sympy-bot
Copy link

sympy-bot commented Feb 24, 2022

Hi, I am the SymPy bot (v163). I'm here to help you write a release notes entry. Please read the guide on how to write release notes.

Your release notes are in good order.

Here is what the release notes will look like:

This will be added to https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Release-Notes-for-1.11.

Click here to see the pull request description that was parsed.
#### References to other Issues or PRs
<!-- If this pull request fixes an issue, write "Fixes #NNNN" in that exact
format, e.g. "Fixes #1234" (see
https://tinyurl.com/auto-closing for more information). Also, please
write a comment on that issue linking back to this pull request once it is
open. -->

This is based off of https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/22864, but I've updated the styling of the Furo theme. This is not at all finished yet, and we also haven't formally decided to switch to Furo yet either. 

Demo site here: https://www.asmeurer.com/sympy-furo-demo/


#### Brief description of what is fixed or changed

I've done a lot of styling, but there are still things that can be improved. Please build the docs and play around with it. If you find something that is low contrast or the wrong color, it probably means it is something I didn't notice.

Also please try both the light and dark theme (you can click the icon at the top of the page).

I haven't changed any fonts or font sizes, except for the code examples. It's a possibility to do this, but I'd like feedback. 

CC @bertiewooster 

#### Other comments

**TODOs**

- [x] Check if fonts should be adjusted (different fonts, sizes, etc.)
- [x] Add a version selector to the sidebar
- [x] Adjust the logo size on mobile (or alternately, make the whole sidebar scrollable)
- [x] Fix all remaining contrast issues
- [x] Remove all text referencing SymPy Live

#### Release Notes

<!-- Write the release notes for this release below between the BEGIN and END
statements. The basic format is a bulleted list with the name of the subpackage
and the release note for this PR. For example:

* solvers
  * Added a new solver for logarithmic equations.

* functions
  * Fixed a bug with log of integers.

or if no release note(s) should be included use:

NO ENTRY

See https://github.com/sympy/sympy/wiki/Writing-Release-Notes for more
information on how to write release notes. The bot will check your release
notes automatically to see if they are formatted correctly. -->

<!-- BEGIN RELEASE NOTES -->
- other
  - The documentation now uses the [Furo](https://pradyunsg.me/furo/) Sphinx theme. 
<!-- END RELEASE NOTES -->

Update

The release notes on the wiki have been updated.

@sympy-bot
Copy link

sympy-bot commented Feb 24, 2022

🟠

Hi, I am the SymPy bot (v163). I've noticed that some of your commits add or delete files. Since this is sometimes done unintentionally, I wanted to alert you about it.

This is an experimental feature of SymPy Bot. If you have any feedback on it, please comment at sympy/sympy-bot#75.

The following commits add new files:

  • bbe3269:
    • doc/src/_static/custom.css
  • 90ff6b1:
    • doc/src/_templates/sidebar/versions.html
  • abf5039:
    • doc/src/_pygments/styles.py

The following commits delete files:

  • 4b00be3:
    • doc/ext/sympylive.py
  • f5ae2cf:
    • doc/src/_static/default.css_t
  • c233492:
    • doc/src/_templates/layout.html

If these files were added/deleted on purpose, you can ignore this message.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 24, 2022

Benchmark results from GitHub Actions

Lower numbers are good, higher numbers are bad. A ratio less than 1
means a speed up and greater than 1 means a slowdown. Green lines
beginning with + are slowdowns (the PR is slower then master or
master is slower than the previous release). Red lines beginning
with - are speedups.

Significantly changed benchmark results (PR vs master)

Significantly changed benchmark results (master vs previous release)

       before           after         ratio
     [77f1d79c]       [459a2aa4]
     <sympy-1.10.1^0>                 
+      98.7±0.6ms        178±0.8ms     1.80  sum.TimeSum.time_doit

Full benchmark results can be found as artifacts in GitHub Actions
(click on checks at the top of the PR).

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

Note: we should probably rebase away the submodule addition before merging any of this.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

I've uploaded a demo site so you don't have to build this yourself https://github.com/asmeurer/sympy-furo-demo

@bertiewooster
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @asmeurer. To save folks a click, the built site is at https://www.asmeurer.com/sympy-furo-demo/

@bertiewooster
Copy link
Contributor

bertiewooster commented Feb 25, 2022

Great start! Comments:

  1. The Search box appears to connect to the body of the page, because they're about the same color. The Furo example site has the search box the same color as the rest of the left navbar. Is that possible and advisable? I can imagine that having a dark green background would make it hard to read black text being input; is it possible to make the input text a light color?
  2. Lighthouse reports that the accessibility is very good, at 98/100. The one problem it found is Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
    1. One situation where this occurs is the light green text in a function template light gray box, for example sympy.core.sympify.. It also occurs for links (for example, "next section"), which are light green on white background. Perhaps make those types of text dark green instead of light? Personally, I prefer lighter colors for large page elements, so maybe make the left navbar a light green, and the text in the function template a dark green?
    2. Another is the text in a code block. Perhaps make the code block background color lighter?

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

The Search box appears to connect to the body of the page, because they're about the same color. The Furo example site has the search box the same color as the rest of the left navbar. Is that possible and advisable? I can imagine that having a dark green background would make it hard to read black text being input; is it possible to make the input text a light color?

Sure that's doable. I'm not sure how good it would look. Having it blend in does make it harder to see. I guess the flip side of that is that it's less distracting. The current docs site has the search bar white https://docs.sympy.org/dev/index.html.

Lighthouse reports that the accessibility is very good, at 98/100. The one problem it found is Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Yeah, I noticed some of these things as well (the Chrome inspect accessibility thing flagged them).

I'm a little unsure how to fix some of them. A problem I noticed with these color contrast checkers is that they only consider the contrast of the text against its background. They don't consider the contrast of the text with the surrounding text. This is particularly important for the link color. We can make the (currently green) links have a better contrast against the background by making them darker, but then they become harder to see as links against the surrounding black text (you can see what I mean if you right click "inspect" a link in Chrome and then click the color in the inspector and choose the suggested higher contrast color).

I can try flipping the dark and light greens to see how it looks.

I was also planning on adjusting the code block background (which should be easier than trying to restyle all the different syntax highlighting colors). The problem is the Chrome dev tools only support suggesting foreground colors, not background colors. But I did find https://accessible-colors.com/ which allows both. AAA is hard to achieve while still keeping distinguishable colors, but we should be able to get AA I think. I also tried just messing with the color picker, but I had a hard time finding something I liked aesthetically. I do personally like how the code blocks stand out as I think the examples are the most important part of documentation.

doc/src/conf.py Outdated

html_theme_options = {
"light_css_variables": css_settings_common,
"dark_css_variables": {**css_settings_common,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You shouldn't need this -- the light mode variables get inherited for dark mode.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't realize this. It would be nice if this were mentioned at https://pradyunsg.me/furo/customisation/#light-css-variables-dark-css-variables

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This was working, but I updated to the latest Furo and it stopped working and I had to separate them again.

@pradyunsg
Copy link

Add a version selector to the sidebar

Relevant here: https://pradyunsg.me/furo/customisation/sidebar/. See also pradyunsg/furo#372.

@moorepants
Copy link
Member

moorepants commented Feb 25, 2022

This is looking pretty nice. I like the green!
I noticed that the API rendering isn't so great:
image

The name of the function/class/method doesn't stand out. The bold "parent" "axisreturns" etc overwhelms the name of the function. The name of the functions should be the most distinct thing on the page. The boldness of the heads "parameters", "warns" is not even present. Also the notes are way too strong (in color I guess):
image

This also detracts from the function name which should be the most prominent thing.

@moorepants
Copy link
Member

If you scroll through the api listing, the function names should be the only thing you can detect while scrolling (or the primary thing).

@namannimmo10
Copy link
Member

Thanks for this. The new docs site looks really nice!

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Mar 3, 2022

Addressed some comments and additional things I noticed:

  • Removed the fancy scrolling when jumping to an anchor (it was too slow on long pages)
  • Made the API headings easier to see. They are also now the only part of the page that is colored.
  • "See also" and "Notes" now use a gray background instead of green. "Warning" is still red.
  • Removed the extra vertical space in the parameters section.
  • Made the "Parameters", "Returns", "Examples", and so on more prominent.
  • Added a GitHub icon to the footer.
  • Made the code block background color slightly dimmer to improve the color contrast.
  • Various small fixes to improve color contrast, especially in dark mode.

I had one idea also, which is to make the function names easier to "spot" on the page by inverting the colors to make the background green (it is currently grey), and the text black (or some other color that's easy to read on green). I'm a little unsure about it, though. Let me know if you think it would be better that way or the way it is now.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Mar 3, 2022

Another note: we are doing enough modifications in custom.css that it might be a good idea to pin the Furo version. We can update it every once in a while, but whenever we do, we have to check if any CSS modifications are required. Even without custom.css, after updating my local version Furo, there were some additional "supported" CSS variables added that required updating.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Mar 4, 2022

I had one idea also, which is to make the function names easier to "spot" on the page by inverting the colors to make the background green (it is currently grey), and the text black (or some other color that's easy to read on green). I'm a little unsure about it, though. Let me know if you think it would be better that way or the way it is now.

Here's a quick mockup of what I mean. Right now, it looks like this:

Screen Shot 2022-03-03 at 5 18 45 PM

I'm wondering if we should instead change it to something like this:

Screen Shot 2022-03-03 at 5 18 34 PM

Or would that be too noisy on the page? It would only apply to function and class definitions in the API docs, not other headers.

@bertiewooster
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for doing all this detailed work, @asmeurer. I do find the second version visually noisy, as I prefer blocks of color to be subtle; that also makes it easier to achieve sufficient color contrast. How about largely keeping the first version, and making the module prefix names text the darker green? The actual function name could be bold to distinguish it from the module prefixes.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Mar 4, 2022

Pushed a few more fixes:

  • The logo is now high resolution.
  • Various contrast fixes for dark mode, especially in the syntax highlighting.

I'm honestly still not sure how to handle the lighthouse contrast issues in light mode. Unlike dark mode, most of the suggestions for contrast improvements in light mode seem to make the text too close to black to be distinguishable.

Is there an easy way to run lighthouse on every page, with both light and dark mode? I've been running it one page at a time, but different pages have different elements. There are way too many pages to run each page manually.

@moorepants
Copy link
Member

I like both, definitely fixes the issues I reaised. Thanks! For the second, the green bars are strong. Maybe a lighter shade of green would be better. The first one is good too though, and sufficient.

@bertiewooster
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an easy way to run lighthouse on every page, with both light and dark mode?

Lighthouse can be run via npm; I haven't tried that.

I'm not sure if there's a way to automatically do that in both light and dark mode, as the URL doesn't change when I click dark mode. The mode selection does persist when you go from one page to another, so perhaps you could run the Lighthouse scans in light mode, then change to dark mode, then re-running the Lighthouse scans might use the dark mode? I'm not sure if that mode will be picked up by the npm version of Lighthouse.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Mar 4, 2022

It looks like you can force dark mode with the --chrome-flags. But I don't see an easy way to use this to scan every page. It would be nice if there were a tool that just scanned the local HTML files.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Mar 5, 2022

Another thing we can do with Furo is to add a header to each page in the development docs like this:
Screen Shot 2022-03-04 at 6 30 36 PM

Not sure if it's actually a good idea, though. And I would need to figure out how to make it cross-link with Javascript since it doesn't seem to be Jinja templated.

@asmeurer asmeurer closed this Mar 5, 2022
@asmeurer asmeurer reopened this Mar 5, 2022
@bertiewooster
Copy link
Contributor

Another thing we can do with Furo is to add a header to each page in the development docs like this:

I was thinking it'd be nice to temporarily add headers to each page (in both released and dev docs) when we want to publicize a survey or the like to the community--that would reach anyone who uses the docs, not just people who follow SymPy on Github, Twitter, Gitter, etc. Is there an easy way to do that?

@bertiewooster
Copy link
Contributor

I don't see an easy way to use this to scan every page. It would be nice if there were a tool that just scanned the local HTML files.

I think Lighthouse only works if the page is posted on a server. I wonder if there's a way to give it a sitemap to have it visit all the mapped pages?

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Mar 5, 2022

The announcement feature makes it quite easy to add it to the dev docs. To add it to the "latest" docs we would need to manually rebuild the docs from that git tag with the given header (which isn't too hard).

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

Some updates

  • The current page is now highlighted in the sidebar. For example: Screen Shot 2022-03-21 at 6 28 25 PM

  • I've made it so that the whole sidebar scrolls. Previously the logo would be pinned to the top of the page and only the table of contents would scroll. This should make the sidebar more usable on mobile, where the logo takes up a large amount of vertical space.

  • I've added a version selection menu to the sidebar. You can see what it looks like at the bottom of the sidebar at https://www.asmeurer.com/sympy-furo-demo/dev/index.html.
    Screen Shot 2022-03-21 at 6 25 21 PM

    This uses a file called versions.json which will be placed at the root of the sympy_doc repo, which looks like

    {
        "latest": "1.10",
        "dev": "1.11.dev"
    }

    If you build the docs locally the file won't be present and the docs will look like this
    Screen Shot 2022-03-21 at 6 23 17 PM

    This is much simpler than the current solution which injects code into the page after it is built. It also has the advantage that the version selector now appears on every page, not just the index page. Some new code will need to be added to the release process to update the versions.json file.

  • I have removed all references to the SymPy Live extension (mostly from the tutorial). If we ever add a replacement that uses pyiodide, we can reintroduce this text. For now, the extension has been removed because it is not compatible with the Furo theme, and has other issues as well.

This is now ready for review. I have made all the style changes I wanted to make, so please let me know if you see anything that you feel should be changed in any way. Also if anyone is knowledgeable about CSS or Javascript I would appreciate a review of my CSS in custom.css and Javascript in versions.html, as I'm not great at either language.

@asmeurer asmeurer marked this pull request as ready for review March 22, 2022 00:38
Comment on lines 64 to 68
/* Make the "class", "property" and so on before function names in the API*/
/* docs bold. */
em.property:first-child {
font-weight: bold;
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The entire signature is bold by default, so you shouldn't need this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like you are right. This must have been left over from a previous iteration.

}
-->
<div class="sidebar-tree sidebar-versions">
<h5 class="versions-header">Documentation Version</h4>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would suggest adding a padding-left to this, to align it with the rest of the sidebar content. You might want to consider if you want this to look like sidebar captions instead of a heading.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll have to play with it some more. I'm OK with the way it currently looks but I'll see if it looks better this way. Note that I'm not a designer and my HTML/Javascript/CSS skills are terrible, so if you see something that looks off, it's most likely unintentional so please let me know.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually this was supposed to have the exact same padding as the rest of the sidebar, but my editor inserted an incorrect line break in the CSS and messed it up. Should look better now.

"light_css_variables": common_theme_variables,
# The dark variables automatically inherit values from the light variables
"dark_css_variables": {
**common_theme_variables,

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You likely do not need this.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If I comment this line out, the light specific modifications do not carry over to dark mode. I think it was working before when I had an older version of Furo but it stopped working when I updated it.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm... Fascinating. I'll dig into what's happening here later. I'm pretty sure this won't do the wrong thing though, so this is definitely fine to do anyway. :)

@@ -220,6 +308,7 @@
# SymPy logo on title page
html_logo = '_static/sympylogo.png'
latex_logo = '_static/sympylogo_big.png'
html_favicon = '../_build/logo/sympy-notailtext-favicon.ico'

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should likely be logo/... instead? Otherwise, you won't get the logo on the first build (unless I'm misunderstanding your build process).

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, we compile the logo from svg to png and ico as part of the build process (the Makefile dependencies ensure it's compiled first).

@pradyunsg
Copy link

pradyunsg commented Apr 1, 2022

We might want to try upstreaming these changes, although I'm unsure if pygments or sphinx would accept color changes to their themes or if they would consider that to be backwards incompatible. @pradyunsg you may also be interested in this if you want Furo to have better WCAG compatibility.

If pygments gets new better-contrast themes or improves their themes, I'd be very happy to see that. I had considered writing custom pygments theme that had a better contrast story, but I decided against that to minimise how much stuff I was doing in the theme; to instead try contributing to those projects instead.

I haven't actually had the time/mental space to come around to doing that though, so I welcome this! :)

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Apr 1, 2022

Thanks for the review @pradyunsg.

You likely want to override --color-sidebar-background-border as well.

Wow that's a very subtle thing, especially with my other overrides. I guess the best thing to set this to when the sidebar has a different background color as in our case is to var(--color-background-primary).

You can use {% block announcement %} in page.html, to provide the internal content of the announcement, if that's what you want -- as long as you set announcement in html_theme_options to a truthy value.

I don't think we have any announcements we want to add at this point, but that's good to know for the future. We could consider adding one for the dev pages, but I still unsure if it's a good idea.

If pygments gets new better-contrast themes or improves their themes, I'd be very happy to see that. I had considered writing custom pygments theme that had a better contrast story, but I decided against that to minimise how much stuff I was doing in the theme; to instead try contributing to those projects instead.

I more or less feel the same way. I didn't want to spend a whole lot of time on this, as I know it could end up being a huge rabbit hole that would ultimately produce a lot of good work, but not end up being related to the SymPy documentation. That's why I came up with a pretty hacky solution that just reuses the Ruby script I found at https://github.com/mpchadwick/pygments-high-contrast-stylesheets/blob/gh-pages/tools/make-stylesheet. It gets the job done for us, and makes the SymPy docs WCAG compatible.

Ideally the whole thing would be done in Python (I'm not sure what the best library for that would be), and and be more convenient to use. For instance, one could have a function that just takes a pygments theme and automatically makes it WCAG AA compatible without requiring any manual work. Or alternately, just change the themes upstream to be AA compatible. But given that pygments specifically notates which styles have bad contrast gives me the impression that simply updating them is not a simple thing for them to do. The "sphinx" style is actually part of Sphinx, so updating that would be a separate discussion (but again, likely not a simple proposition, as it would affect a lot of projects, including docs.python.org itself).

So for now I'm going to leave this as an open project for someone else to implement, but if you or anyone else ever does, please let me know.

@bertiewooster
Copy link
Contributor

The Lighthouse report reveals an accessibility contrast issue with class etc. green names against a gray background, whether the green text is regular or bold:

sympy-docs-contrast-issue-gray-background

That situation seems to be the only contrast issue; the code blocks are fine.

It's only used in two places, the left sidebar hover, and the right sidebar
active page. This color was taken from the SymPy logo, and modified slightly
to have a 4.5 contrast ratio. Unlike the previous color, this one now has good
contrast, except in dark mode, where we use the old color for the black
background.
- Use color-brand-content and color-brand-primary instead of redefining
  specific things.
- Remove the gray selected header color. It creates bad color contrast. The
  default yellow is easier to work with.
- The primary and content colors now have at least 4.5 contrast, including
  when the header is selected.
- Remove some colors that were defined to nearly identical colors as the
  defaults (but which still have fine color contrast).
Apparently it actually is needed for color contrast compared to the default.
@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Apr 6, 2022

I fixed that and cleaned up some of the colors a bit (we now just have the two greens in color-brand-content and color-brand-primary). Also fixed some contrast issues that only showed when selecting a header (lighthouse does not see these unless you give a URL with an anchor). I also changed the hover color in the left sidebar because it had bad contrast (lighthouse does not look at hover colors).

@bertiewooster
Copy link
Contributor

Great, thanks for going beyond even the automated Lighthouse checks to ensure that as many people as possible can use SymPy documentation.

Comparing the current version (above) to the restyled version (below) demonstrates how much cleaner, more navigable, and more functional the restyled site will be:

sympy-current-example

sympy-furo-example

.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Apr 7, 2022

If there are no further comments, I'd like to merge this. If we find something later that I've missed, we can make additional PRs to fix. It will be good to have this in the dev docs soon so that we can find any such issues before it gets released to the main "latest" documentation.

Let's open new issues for the items we discussed above that were not addressed in this PR.

@oscarbenjamin oscarbenjamin added the CZI: Documentation Issues and pull requests relating to Aaron Meurer's CZI grant documentation project label Apr 7, 2022
@oscarbenjamin
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me. Let's get this in.

@oscarbenjamin oscarbenjamin merged commit 19ed9ef into sympy:master Apr 7, 2022
@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Apr 7, 2022

Looks like I forgot to update the dependencies for Travis. Fix forthcoming.

@asmeurer
Copy link
Member Author

asmeurer commented Apr 7, 2022

I opened several issues for things that were discussed here but not addressed (see the cross references above this comment). If I missed anything, please open an issue for it.

maurogaravello pushed a commit to maurogaravello/sympy that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2022
This removes the separate colors for visited and unvisited. We now use the
darker of the two in light mode and the ligher of the two in dark mode. These
colors satisfy AA color contrast, both against the background and against the
surrounding black/white text (see
sympy#23159).

This replaces the "brand-content" color in light mode since this is primarily
used for links. We still use the lighter color for the API function names in
light mode, so that they pop out more (dark mode already has a lighter color
for API function names).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
CZI: Documentation Issues and pull requests relating to Aaron Meurer's CZI grant documentation project Documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants