Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix setting labels manually on PRs that got labels from labeler. #823

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 4, 2022

Conversation

dhaus67
Copy link
Contributor

@dhaus67 dhaus67 commented Mar 4, 2022

Description

Right now, somehow, its not possible sometimes to set labels on PRs which have labels added by labeler (they will be unchecked after some time). For reference, see this PR and this PR as examples for it not working.
There are, however, PRs where it is working, see this PR and this PR.

It appears that PRs that are created at the beginning with "non-labeler" labels are retaining them, afterwards it seems not to be possible to set those manually.

The issue I found were of this sort, where the labeler is preventing manual labels from being added. I'll try this workaround for now, unsetting the sync-labels property to check whether this will help.

@dhaus67 dhaus67 requested review from ebensh and janisz March 4, 2022 14:02
@roxbot
Copy link
Contributor

roxbot commented Mar 4, 2022

Tag for build #273588 is 3.69.x-16-g8be26a4bfb.

💻 For deploying this image using the dev scripts, run the following first:

export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG='3.69.x-16-g8be26a4bfb'

📦 You can also generate an installation bundle with:

docker run -i --rm stackrox/main:3.69.x-16-g8be26a4bfb central generate interactive > bundle.zip

🕹️ A roxctl binary artifact can be downloaded from CircleCI.

@dhaus67 dhaus67 merged commit 8e8dfe9 into master Mar 4, 2022
@dhaus67 dhaus67 deleted the dh/add-labels-manually branch March 4, 2022 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants