Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Synchronise codecov action settings with rustls #230

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2024

Conversation

ctz
Copy link
Member

@ctz ctz commented Feb 9, 2024

  • moves from the per-repo CODECOV_UPLOAD_TOKEN secret (which I'll delete shortly) to the per-org one
  • removes verbose flag
  • avoid failing build if upload fails

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (4689881) 97.13% compared to head (6629c75) 97.13%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #230   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.13%   97.13%           
=======================================
  Files          19       19           
  Lines        4333     4333           
=======================================
  Hits         4209     4209           
  Misses        124      124           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@cpu cpu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

.github/workflows/ci.yml Show resolved Hide resolved
@cpu cpu added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 12, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 133b644 Feb 12, 2024
60 checks passed
@cpu cpu deleted the jbp-codecov-action-settings branch February 12, 2024 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants