Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add port for RTEMS #3561

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: libc-0.2
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

thesummer
Copy link

@thesummer thesummer commented Jan 26, 2024

I am currently porting the rust compiler and stdlib to the RTEMS realtime operating system (https://www.rtems.org/).

This PR is the prerequisite for my changes to the rust repo.
style.sh succeeds, the libc-test fails to compile on my machine, but since I only add things which are behind guards for target_os = "rtems". I hope CI will give a 馃憤 .

Once this passed. I will also add a PR for main branch.

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jan 26, 2024

Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @JohnTitor (or someone else) soon.

Please see the contribution instructions for more information. Namely, in order to ensure the minimum review times lag, PR authors and assigned reviewers should ensure that the review label (S-waiting-on-review and S-waiting-on-author) stays updated, invoking these commands when appropriate:

  • @rustbot author: the review is finished, PR author should check the comments and take action accordingly
  • @rustbot review: the author is ready for a review, this PR will be queued again in the reviewer's queue

@JohnTitor
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Could you add the target to rustc first? This crate follows rustc's platform support for adding/removing targets.

@thesummer
Copy link
Author

Ah, ok. Will do.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants