Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add greeting code data to responses #94

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2023

Conversation

nevans
Copy link
Collaborator

@nevans nevans commented Jan 2, 2023

This simplifies caching of the server capabilities, as many servers will send their capabilities inside the greeting. It's needed for #31.

The PR is based on #93 only because my test for it is based on that branch. But that PR is a bigger change than this one, so I can rebase this and give it its own test, if necessary.

@nevans nevans requested a review from shugo January 2, 2023 19:29
Copy link
Member

@shugo shugo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks fine!

@nevans nevans force-pushed the response-handlers branch from cfcbcd5 to 89ae479 Compare January 6, 2023 22:25
@nevans nevans force-pushed the record-greeting-response-code-data branch from 1b5e0cb to 10db63c Compare January 6, 2023 22:28
@nevans nevans force-pushed the response-handlers branch 2 times, most recently from 223055e to 800edb8 Compare January 7, 2023 14:50
Base automatically changed from response-handlers to master January 7, 2023 14:57
This simplifies caching of the server capabilities, as many servers will
send their capabilities inside the greeting.  Needed for #31.
@nevans nevans force-pushed the record-greeting-response-code-data branch from 10db63c to 4424213 Compare January 7, 2023 15:36
@nevans nevans merged commit 0304ca3 into master Jan 8, 2023
@nevans nevans deleted the record-greeting-response-code-data branch January 8, 2023 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants