Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a CODEOWNERS file #92

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2024
Merged

Add a CODEOWNERS file #92

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 5, 2024

Conversation

ydah
Copy link
Member

@ydah ydah commented Jan 4, 2024

Follow up: rubocop/rubocop-rspec#1762


Before submitting the PR make sure the following are checked:

  • Feature branch is up-to-date with main (if not - rebase it).
  • Squashed related commits together.
  • Added tests.
  • Updated documentation.
  • Added an entry to the CHANGELOG.md if the new code introduces user-observable changes.
  • The build (bundle exec rake) passes (be sure to run this locally, since it may produce updated documentation that you will need to commit).

@ydah ydah requested a review from a team January 5, 2024 13:50
@bquorning
Copy link
Contributor

Actually, I would like to not own this repo (or rubocop-factory_bot), but of course still be part of rubocop-rspec. Is it overkill to make a separate group for each repo?

@ydah
Copy link
Member Author

ydah commented Jan 5, 2024

I don't have a strong opinion. However, it seems to me that creating a team for each repository is a bit difficult to manage.

@pirj
Copy link
Member

pirj commented Jan 5, 2024

We have to define a team anyway to use it in codeowners like@rubocop/rubocop-rspec, right?

@pirj pirj merged commit f6907c4 into main Jan 5, 2024
25 checks passed
@pirj pirj deleted the codeowners branch January 5, 2024 18:23
@pirj
Copy link
Member

pirj commented Jan 5, 2024

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants