Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do not assign new fp attribute when exiting context manager #7566

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Dec 31, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
5 changes: 5 additions & 0 deletions Tests/test_image.py
Expand Up @@ -1015,6 +1015,11 @@ def test_fli_overrun2(self):
except OSError as e:
assert str(e) == "buffer overrun when reading image file"

def test_exit_fp(self):
with Image.new("L", (1, 1)) as im:
pass
assert not hasattr(im, "fp")

def test_close_graceful(self, caplog):
with Image.open("Tests/images/hopper.jpg") as im:
copy = im.copy()
Expand Down
17 changes: 9 additions & 8 deletions src/PIL/Image.py
Expand Up @@ -528,14 +528,15 @@ def __enter__(self):
return self

def __exit__(self, *args):
if hasattr(self, "fp") and getattr(self, "_exclusive_fp", False):
if getattr(self, "_fp", False):
if self._fp != self.fp:
self._fp.close()
self._fp = DeferredError(ValueError("Operation on closed image"))
if self.fp:
self.fp.close()
self.fp = None
if hasattr(self, "fp"):
if getattr(self, "_exclusive_fp", False):
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Out of curiosity: does exclusive_fp mean, like I think it does, "we own this fp because we opened it"? If so, does it make sense for .close() to also close FPs that aren't "owned" by this instance?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Out of curiosity: does exclusive_fp mean, like I think it does, "we own this fp because we opened it"?

Yes

Pillow/src/PIL/Image.py

Lines 3250 to 3258 in 697c24b

if filename:
fp = builtins.open(filename, "rb")
exclusive_fp = True
try:
fp.seek(0)
except (AttributeError, io.UnsupportedOperation):
fp = io.BytesIO(fp.read())
exclusive_fp = True

If so, does it make sense for .close() to also close FPs that aren't "owned" by this instance?

See #5309

if getattr(self, "_fp", False):
if self._fp != self.fp:
self._fp.close()
self._fp = DeferredError(ValueError("Operation on closed image"))
if self.fp:
self.fp.close()
self.fp = None
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be easier to read if the outermost layer of the pyramid was negated?

Suggested change
if hasattr(self, "fp"):
if getattr(self, "_exclusive_fp", False):
if getattr(self, "_fp", False):
if self._fp != self.fp:
self._fp.close()
self._fp = DeferredError(ValueError("Operation on closed image"))
if self.fp:
self.fp.close()
self.fp = None
if not hasattr(self, "fp"):
return
if getattr(self, "_exclusive_fp", False):
if getattr(self, "_fp", False):
if self._fp != self.fp:
self._fp.close()
self._fp = DeferredError(ValueError("Operation on closed image"))
if self.fp:
self.fp.close()
self.fp = None

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Easier to read in isolation, yes, but I kind of like the fact that this version mirrors close() -

Pillow/src/PIL/Image.py

Lines 530 to 565 in 5431b15

def __exit__(self, *args):
if hasattr(self, "fp"):
if getattr(self, "_exclusive_fp", False):
if getattr(self, "_fp", False):
if self._fp != self.fp:
self._fp.close()
self._fp = DeferredError(ValueError("Operation on closed image"))
if self.fp:
self.fp.close()
self.fp = None
def close(self):
"""
Closes the file pointer, if possible.
This operation will destroy the image core and release its memory.
The image data will be unusable afterward.
This function is required to close images that have multiple frames or
have not had their file read and closed by the
:py:meth:`~PIL.Image.Image.load` method. See :ref:`file-handling` for
more information.
"""
if hasattr(self, "fp"):
try:
if getattr(self, "_fp", False):
if self._fp != self.fp:
self._fp.close()
self._fp = DeferredError(ValueError("Operation on closed image"))
if self.fp:
self.fp.close()
self.fp = None
except Exception as msg:
logger.debug("Error closing: %s", msg)
if getattr(self, "map", None):

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should that code be extracted from close() then and reused in both of these places? _close_fp()?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok, I've pushed a commit.


def close(self):
"""
Expand Down