Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump pyspnego from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1 #1693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 24, 2023
Merged

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jul 1, 2023

Bumps pyspnego from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1.

Release notes

Sourced from pyspnego's releases.

v0.9.1

What's Changed

0.9.1 - 2023-06-14

  • Always set the NTLMSSP_REQUEST_VERSION flag on the NTLM Negotiate message
    • This aligns the behaviour with how SSPI generates this message

Full Changelog: jborean93/pyspnego@v0.9.0...v0.9.1

v0.9.0

What's Changed

0.9.0 - 2023-04-29

  • Added the spnego.ContextReq.dce_style flag to enable DCE authentication mode
    • This is used in protocols like RPC/DCE
  • The value for spnego.iov.BufferType.sign_only on SSPI has changed from representing SECBUFFER_MECHLIST to SECBUFFER_READONLY_WITH_CHECKSUM
    • This is to better match what sign_only means when using it with GSSAPI
    • It is needed to support RPC encryption and signature headers on SSPI
    • The use of SECBUFFER_MECHLIST is not seen in any examples in the wild and is most likely an internal flag
  • Added the IOV buffer type spnego.iov.BufferType.data_readonly
    • For SSPI this corresponds to SECBUFFER_DATA | SECBUFFER_READONLY
    • For GSSAPI this corresponds to GSS_IOV_BUFFER_TYPE_EMPTY
    • As GSSAPI has no actual equivalent to this the empty buffer type is used which in testing results in compatible buffers
    • This is used for DCE/RPC wrapping when the PDU header and sec trailer are not signed but are included in the wrap_iov buffers.
  • Added limited support for wrap_iov and unwrap_iov in the Python NTLM context provider.
    • This currently only supports spnego.iov.BufferType.header, spnego.iov.BufferType.data, spnego.iov.BufferType.sign_only, spnego.iov.BufferType.data_readonly, and spnego.iov.BufferType.stream
    • header
      • wrap_iov: Used to place the resulting signature in the buffer
      • unwrap_iov: Used as the signature source for validation
    • data
      • wrap_iov: Data to be encrypted/sealed
      • unwrap_iov: Data to be decrypted/unsealed
    • sign_only
      • wrap_iov: Data to be included in the signature/header generation
      • unwrap_iov: Data to be included in the signature/header verification
    • data_readonly is treated the same as sign_only
    • stream
      • wrap_iov: Not supported
      • unwrap_iov: Contains the full value to decrypt with the headers in the beginning, must be coupled with a subsequent data buffer of the type data to place the decrypted value into
    • The behaviour used here is modelled as closely as possible to how SSPI works but not all the permutations have been tested.
    • The header/signature will be generated from the data, sign_only, data_readonly values concat together in the order they are provided.
  • Added the query_message_sizes() function on a context to retrieve the important message sizes
    • Currently this only contains the size of the message header, also known as the signature or security trailer

... (truncated)

Changelog

Sourced from pyspnego's changelog.

0.9.1 - 2023-06-14

  • Always set the NTLMSSP_REQUEST_VERSION flag on the NTLM Negotiate message
    • This aligns the behaviour with how SSPI generates this message

0.9.0 - 2023-04-29

  • Added the spnego.ContextReq.dce_style flag to enable DCE authentication mode
    • This is used in protocols like RPC/DCE
  • The value for spnego.iov.BufferType.sign_only on SSPI has changed from representing SECBUFFER_MECHLIST to SECBUFFER_READONLY_WITH_CHECKSUM
    • This is to better match what sign_only means when using it with GSSAPI
    • It is needed to support RPC encryption and signature headers on SSPI
    • The use of SECBUFFER_MECHLIST is not seen in any examples in the wild and is most likely an internal flag
  • Added the IOV buffer type spnego.iov.BufferType.data_readonly
    • For SSPI this corresponds to SECBUFFER_DATA | SECBUFFER_READONLY
    • For GSSAPI this corresponds to GSS_IOV_BUFFER_TYPE_EMPTY
    • As GSSAPI has no actual equivalent to this the empty buffer type is used which in testing results in compatible buffers
    • This is used for DCE/RPC wrapping when the PDU header and sec trailer are not signed but are included in the wrap_iov buffers.
  • Added limited support for wrap_iov and unwrap_iov in the Python NTLM context provider.
    • This currently only supports spnego.iov.BufferType.header, spnego.iov.BufferType.data, spnego.iov.BufferType.sign_only, spnego.iov.BufferType.data_readonly, and spnego.iov.BufferType.stream
    • header
      • wrap_iov: Used to place the resulting signature in the buffer
      • unwrap_iov: Used as the signature source for validation
    • data
      • wrap_iov: Data to be encrypted/sealed
      • unwrap_iov: Data to be decrypted/unsealed
    • sign_only
      • wrap_iov: Data to be included in the signature/header generation
      • unwrap_iov: Data to be included in the signature/header verification
    • data_readonly is treated the same as sign_only
    • stream
      • wrap_iov: Not supported
      • unwrap_iov: Contains the full value to decrypt with the headers in the beginning, must be coupled with a subsequent data buffer of the type data to place the decrypted value into
    • The behaviour used here is modelled as closely as possible to how SSPI works but not all the permutations have been tested.
    • The header/signature will be generated from the data, sign_only, data_readonly values concat together in the order they are provided.
  • Added the query_message_sizes() function on a context to retrieve the important message sizes
    • Currently this only contains the size of the message header, also known as the signature or security trailer
Commits

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [pyspnego](https://github.com/jborean93/pyspnego) from 0.8.0 to 0.9.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/jborean93/pyspnego/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/jborean93/pyspnego/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](jborean93/pyspnego@v0.8.0...v0.9.1)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: pyspnego
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@studioj studioj merged commit 42396a5 into main Jul 24, 2023
13 of 14 checks passed
@studioj studioj deleted the dependabot/pip/main/pyspnego-0.9.1 branch July 24, 2023 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant