Fix BackedEnum::tryFrom not being nullable #2302
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
schlndh
force-pushed
the
fix-BackedEnumTryFromNotNullable
branch
from
af6a631
to
207d252
Compare
schlndh
added a commit
to schlndh/maria-stan
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 25, 2023
schlndh
force-pushed
the
fix-BackedEnumTryFromNotNullable
branch
from
207d252
to
8b1b035
Compare
|
Hi, I'm sorry, but I don't understand your change in BackedEnumFromMethodDynamicReturnTypeExtension. But I fixed it myself while keeping you as the author (plus I used your tests): bb31aab?w=1 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I encountered this case: https://phpstan.org/r/c1013cf7-d2ea-4d7a-91a9-9839456e5740 where the result of
tryFromis incorrectly being reported as not nullable when converting a superset enum to a subset enum. Here is my attempt to fix it.In addition, the original extension ignores the possibility of
strict_typesnot being enabled. I kept this behavior, as I'm not sure what the policy is with regards tostrict_types(i.e. it seems thatisDeclareStrictTypesis not called from any other type extension). But I at least added a few tests forstrict_types=1.