Implement @phpstan-consistent-constructor

[canvural]

This PR adds a new tag called @phpstan-consistent-constructor and a rule to enforce it.

I wasn't sure which level this rule should be in, so for now I added it to level 0. But I can change it to correct one.

There are not many test cases because same things are covered by OverridingMethodRule tests. I only tested relevant stuff for this rule. But of course I can add more test cases, if there is an edge case we need to cover.

[ondrejmirtes]

This is almost perfect :) I think I'd like to see some edge cases handled. I think that @phpstan-consistent-constructor should be allowed above a class that doesn't have constructor at all.

Please add a test that it's possible to extend such class and that: 1) missing constructor in a subclass is not reported, 2) subclass can have a constructor with no parameters (optional parameters also allowed, 3) subclass cannot have a constructor with required parameters.

[ondrejmirtes]

And also, please open a PR in https://github.com/phpstan/phpstan that updates this blogpost :) https://phpstan.org/blog/solving-phpstan-error-unsafe-usage-of-new-static Thanks

[canvural]

Added the test cases. And yeah, this case was not covered, so fixed it.

[ondrejmirtes]

Thank you!