Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pull syntax functions down into the relevant classes instead of relyi… #225

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 25, 2024

Conversation

Rosomack
Copy link
Contributor

The time has come for long-overdue cleanup of our syntax. Historically, we used to support two syntaxes, but this has changed a long while back.

As such, it no longer makes sense to keep DSL functions as extensions. It's messy, creates an unnecessary generics hell and prevents concise generics syntax for some new features like runOn.

This does mean breaking changes due to imports that will no longer be valid / necessary. However, these changes would be simple to resolve.

Time to 🧹 !

@Rosomack Rosomack requested a review from mattmook June 23, 2024 14:16
Rosomack and others added 2 commits June 25, 2024 12:08

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature.
bagder Daniel Stenberg
…ng on extensions.
@Rosomack Rosomack force-pushed the feature/syntax-cleanup branch from 159ec31 to a85b630 Compare June 25, 2024 10:08
@Rosomack Rosomack merged commit 713ad82 into main Jun 25, 2024
12 checks passed
@Rosomack Rosomack deleted the feature/syntax-cleanup branch June 25, 2024 10:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants