Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: a GVKP with no plural should be equivalent to the same GVK #2731

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2025

Conversation

metacosm
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun claprun@redhat.com

@metacosm metacosm self-assigned this Mar 11, 2025
@metacosm metacosm requested review from csviri and xstefank March 11, 2025 09:46
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 11, 2025
Signed-off-by: Chris Laprun <claprun@redhat.com>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 11, 2025
@csviri csviri merged commit 4ae9361 into main Mar 12, 2025
20 checks passed
@csviri csviri deleted the gvk-equals branch March 12, 2025 09:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants