Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(pkg): add default fallback and types export #612

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 16, 2024
Merged

Conversation

wolfy1339
Copy link
Member

Resolves octokit/core.js#667
Resolves octokit/core.js#665


Before the change?

  • Some consumers of this package could not resolve it properly (ex: jest, ts-node, tsx)
  • CJS consumers would be getting errors even though the package is ESM
  • Consumers cannot import paths from the package like in CJS

After the change?

  • Clients should be able to import the module without any errors with the fallback
  • CJS consumers will generate a better error with the new fallback
  • Consumers are able to import types from the dist-types/types.d.ts file in the package

Pull request checklist

  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features)
  • Docs have been reviewed and added / updated if needed (for bug fixes / features)

Does this introduce a breaking change?

Please see our docs on breaking changes to help!

  • Yes
  • No

@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 added the Type: Bug Something isn't working as documented label Apr 15, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

👋 Hi! Thank you for this contribution! Just to let you know, our GitHub SDK team does a round of issue and PR reviews twice a week, every Monday and Friday! We have a process in place for prioritizing and responding to your input. Because you are a part of this community please feel free to comment, add to, or pick up any issues/PRs that are labled with Status: Up for grabs. You & others like you are the reason all of this works! So thank you & happy coding! 🚀

gr2m
gr2m previously approved these changes Apr 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@gr2m gr2m left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

man I really hoped that with the ESM standard we would put all this nonsense behind us 😭 thank you for seeing the transition through and addressing the follow ups ❤️

@wolfy1339
Copy link
Member Author

It seems nobody has the same idea of how to interpret the standard

@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 merged commit 069235f into main Apr 16, 2024
7 checks passed
@wolfy1339 wolfy1339 deleted the fix-esm-exports branch April 16, 2024 00:09
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 11.1.1 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

wolfy1339 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
released Type: Bug Something isn't working as documented
Projects
Archived in project
2 participants