Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MAINT: Bump cibuildwheel to v2.16.4 #25720

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 29, 2024

Conversation

charris
Copy link
Member

@charris charris commented Jan 29, 2024

Backport of #25503.

PyPy has a new release, so we should be able to update cibuildwheel to the latest 2.16.4 version

@charris charris added 03 - Maintenance 08 - Backport Used to tag backport PRs labels Jan 29, 2024
@charris charris added this to the 1.26.4 release milestone Jan 29, 2024
@charris charris merged commit 052165e into numpy:maintenance/1.26.x Jan 29, 2024
55 checks passed
@charris charris deleted the backport-25503 branch January 29, 2024 20:36
@henryiii
Copy link
Contributor

FYI, 2.16.5 is out with support for the new macos-14 AS runners, and a very important Windows fix for the (currently rolling out in actions images, even if "pinned") powershell 7.3+.

@mattip
Copy link
Member

mattip commented Jan 31, 2024

On those new runners, how do you choose between x86_64 and arm64? Will cibuildwheel now build arm64 wheels without cross compile on macos?

@andyfaff
Copy link
Contributor

What are AS runners?

Cibuildwheel builds macos_arm64 wheels natively on cirrus.

@andyfaff
Copy link
Contributor

Ah new macos-14 runners that are in beta are M1 based.

@henryiii
Copy link
Contributor

Cibuildwheel builds macos_arm64 wheels natively on cirrus.

Yes, that’s why it was easy to support when GHA added it. :) And macos-14 is Apple Silicon (AS) / ARM / M1. 11-13 are Intel. (For paid plans, macos-13-xlarge is also AS).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
03 - Maintenance 08 - Backport Used to tag backport PRs
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants