Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add filter operation #1588
Add filter operation #1588
Changes from 4 commits
69a6785
b554a5b
c5919c4
38187c0
6cd9d8c
98c45ed
65f4b15
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This was the best way I could find to turn each value into a truthy value to determine if it should be included. LMK if there's a better way
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm, yeah there should be a cleaner way. What this function is basically doing is a map(select(X)).
You could create a new
select
expression node and give the expression.RHS to it.something like:
Pretty sure this could be extended to create a map(select) expression and just delegate the logic to those functions entirely...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this isn't actually the right result - this means the filter function is return two arrays - each with a single element. It should return a single array with two elements
I think if you refactor to use map and select under the hood - it would do the right thing.