Partially revert changes from #1081

[martincostello]

• Sometimes, for unknown reasons, dotnet-outdated returns an error even if some of the NuGet packages are updated.
  Instead of failing, so all the NuGet packages updates are lost, instead just emit a warning and continue.
• Fix incorrect spelling of "workload".
• Regenerate the contents of the dist folder.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR partially reverts changes from #1081 to prevent the entire NuGet package update process from failing if dotnet-outdated returns an error, and it also corrects a spelling error.

• Corrected a typo in the error message for dotnet workload restore
• Changed the handling of dotnet outdated errors from failing (with exit) to emitting a warning instead

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

.github/workflows/update-dotnet-sdk.yml:361

• The typo in 'workfload' has been corrected to 'workload'; please verify similar messages are updated accordingly for consistency.

Write-Output "::error::dotnet workload restore failed with code ${LASTEXITCODE}"

.github/workflows/update-dotnet-sdk.yml:392

• [nitpick] Changing the error output to a warning in the dotnet outdated step means the workflow will continue despite failures. Please confirm that this behavior is intentional and fully documented for future maintenance.

Write-Output "::warning::dotnet outdated failed with code ${LASTEXITCODE}"

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.72%. Comparing base (c1d4f0f) to head (232bd0b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1242   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.72%   93.72%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         478      478           
  Branches      113      118    +5     
=======================================
  Hits          448      448           
  Misses         30       30           

Flag	Coverage Δ
linux	93.72% <ø> (ø)
macos	93.72% <ø> (ø)
windows	93.72% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.