-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 339
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop the ahash
dependency
#2891
Drop the ahash
dependency
#2891
Conversation
WalkthroughThe series of changes focus on enhancing the hash table implementations across the project, shifting between Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
bench/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
lightning/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
possiblyrandom/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (4)
- lightning/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 5
lightning/src/util/mod.rs (1)
- 35-35: LGTM!
possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs (2)
- 21-38: LGTM!
- 34-38: LGTM!
lightning/src/lib.rs (1)
- 173-173: SKIP: No specific code changes annotated for review.
lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs (1)
- 7-164: LGTM!
02b187f
to
0ce96c6
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention:
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2891 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.13% 89.39% +0.26%
==========================================
Files 115 117 +2
Lines 94179 96569 +2390
Branches 94179 96569 +2390
==========================================
+ Hits 83944 86327 +2383
- Misses 7761 7816 +55
+ Partials 2474 2426 -48 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
8ef043d
to
dcf6d5c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (4)
Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
bench/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
lightning/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
possiblyrandom/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (5)
- ci/check-cfg-flags.py (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- lightning/src/lib.rs
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs
Additional comments: 2
ci/check-cfg-flags.py (2)
- 16-17: Ensure the "possiblyrandom" feature is correctly integrated into other parts of the project, as this change indicates its significance in feature management.
- 18-18: The addition of the "getrandom" feature should be verified for correct usage across the project, especially in contexts where OS randomness is leveraged.
1b4382a
to
852d1d8
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (6)
Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
bench/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
fuzz/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
lightning-invoice/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
lightning/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
possiblyrandom/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
- ci/check-cfg-flags.py (1 hunks)
- fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs (8 hunks)
- fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (6 hunks)
- fuzz/src/indexedmap.rs (2 hunks)
- fuzz/src/router.rs (8 hunks)
- lightning-invoice/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs (4 hunks)
- lightning/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- .github/workflows/build.yml
- ci/check-cfg-flags.py
- fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs
- fuzz/src/full_stack.rs
- fuzz/src/indexedmap.rs
- fuzz/src/router.rs
- lightning-invoice/src/lib.rs
- lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
- lightning/src/lib.rs
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs
852d1d8
to
d3b0af0
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (7)
Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
bench/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
fuzz/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
lightning-invoice/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
lightning/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
no-std-check/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
possiblyrandom/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
- ci/check-cfg-flags.py (1 hunks)
- fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs (8 hunks)
- fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (6 hunks)
- fuzz/src/indexedmap.rs (2 hunks)
- fuzz/src/router.rs (8 hunks)
- lightning-invoice/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs (4 hunks)
- lightning/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- .github/workflows/build.yml
- ci/check-cfg-flags.py
- fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs
- fuzz/src/full_stack.rs
- fuzz/src/indexedmap.rs
- fuzz/src/router.rs
- lightning-invoice/src/lib.rs
- lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
- lightning/src/lib.rs
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs
d3b0af0
to
d887c4f
Compare
Note the one failing CI job here is an "out of disk space" issue... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
latest_monitors: Mutex::new(HashMap::new()), | ||
latest_monitors: Mutex::new(new_hash_map()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
When should we use functions like new_hash_map
? I see it's also used in some non-fuzzing code currently.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Always, when we upgraded hashbrown a few weeks ago we had to start using it as we now can't use HashMap::new
directly (outside of std).
d887c4f
to
5243ef9
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Please squash.
In the next commit we'll drop the `ahash` dependency in favor of directly calling `getrandom` to seed our hash tables. However, we'd like to depend on `getrandom` only on certain platforms *and* only when certain features (no-std) are set. This introduces an indirection crate to do so, allowing us to depend on it only when `no-std` is set but only depending on `getrandom` on platforms which it supports.
tkaitchuck/aHash#196 bumped the MSRV of `ahash` in a patch release, which makes it rather difficult for us to have it as a dependency. Further, it seems that `ahash` hasn't been particularly robust in the past, notably tkaitchuck/aHash#163 and tkaitchuck/aHash#166. Luckily, `core` provides `SipHasher` even on no-std (sadly its SipHash-2-4 unlike the SipHash-1-3 used by the `DefaultHasher` in `std`). Thus, we drop the `ahash` dependency entirely here and simply wrap `SipHasher` for our `no-std` HashMaps.
5243ef9
to
eecd2cd
Compare
Squashed without further changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (7)
Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
bench/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
fuzz/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
lightning-invoice/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
lightning/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
no-std-check/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
possiblyrandom/Cargo.toml
is excluded by:!**/*.toml
Files selected for processing (12)
- .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
- ci/check-cfg-flags.py (1 hunks)
- fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs (8 hunks)
- fuzz/src/full_stack.rs (6 hunks)
- fuzz/src/indexedmap.rs (2 hunks)
- fuzz/src/router.rs (8 hunks)
- lightning-invoice/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs (4 hunks)
- lightning/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs (1 hunks)
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs (1 hunks)
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (12)
- .github/workflows/build.yml
- ci/check-cfg-flags.py
- fuzz/src/chanmon_consistency.rs
- fuzz/src/full_stack.rs
- fuzz/src/indexedmap.rs
- fuzz/src/router.rs
- lightning-invoice/src/lib.rs
- lightning-invoice/src/utils.rs
- lightning/src/lib.rs
- lightning/src/util/hash_tables.rs
- lightning/src/util/mod.rs
- possiblyrandom/src/lib.rs
FWIW, they now reverted their MSRV bump with the just-released v0.8.9 (cf. tkaitchuck/aHash#208). |
It is a performance regression (ahash uses AES on platforms with AES intrinsics, and a very weak hash function otherwise, and we replaced it with SipHash-2-4), but if we get around to fixing it we should consider fixing it for std as well as no-std (as std always uses the default, which is SipHash-1-3). The particularly weak hash function fallback of ahash is not a super great fallback, though, doubly so considering in most cases that's what we were using ahash for, since it was no-std only. Ultimately the only place the performance matters that much is in routing, and we might consider something weaker more generally there. |
tkaitchuck/aHash#196 bumped the MSRV of
ahash
in a patch release, which makes it rather difficult for usto have it as a dependency.
Further, it seems that
ahash
hasn't been particularly robust inthe past, notably
tkaitchuck/aHash#163 and
tkaitchuck/aHash#166.
Luckily,
core
providesSipHasher
even on no-std (sadly itsSipHash-2-4 unlike the SipHash-1-3 used by the
DefaultHasher
instd
). Thus, we drop theahash
dependency entirely here andsimply wrap
SipHasher
for ourno-std
HashMaps.