Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add additional coverage to full_stack_target #2850

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 9, 2024

Conversation

TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Based on #2810, this adds coverage in the full_stack_target which would have caught #2842, both directly (using node announcement generation) and indirectly (with a new test case which tests gossip forwarding).

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 24, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@TheBlueMatt has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 29 minutes and 40 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7c94636 and 440a3ea.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jan 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (e64342a) 89.18% compared to head (7aa06d2) 90.02%.
Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2850      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.18%   90.02%   +0.84%     
==========================================
  Files         115      115              
  Lines       93379    98265    +4886     
  Branches    93379    98265    +4886     
==========================================
+ Hits        83276    88466    +5190     
+ Misses       7575     7373     -202     
+ Partials     2528     2426     -102     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt force-pushed the 2024-01-fuzz-gossip branch 4 times, most recently from 4944c83 to 440a3ea Compare February 2, 2024 18:06
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
fuzz/src/full_stack.rs Show resolved Hide resolved
To potentially get more test coverage
The whole point of full_stack_target is to just expose our entire
API to the fuzzer and see what happens. Sadly, we're really only
exposing a small subset of our API. This improves that by exposing
a handful of other assorted methods from ChannelManager and
PeerManager.
This will make test_no_existing_test_breakage marginally easier to
update.
@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fixed silent rebase conflict and added coverage of channel config updating.

@TheBlueMatt
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Diff is fuzz-only and mostly additive so not really worth getting a second review on it.

@TheBlueMatt TheBlueMatt merged commit d70124c into lightningdevkit:main Feb 9, 2024
14 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants