Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[KEP-3085] Promote PodReadyToStartContainers to beta in 1.29 #119659

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 12, 2023
Merged

[KEP-3085] Promote PodReadyToStartContainers to beta in 1.29 #119659

merged 1 commit into from Oct 12, 2023

Conversation

kannon92
Copy link
Contributor

@kannon92 kannon92 commented Jul 28, 2023 •
edited

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

As part of the beta promotion for PodReadyToStartContainers (KEP 3085), we need to move the API from a kubelet constant to a api versioned condition.

This also changes the feature gate to beta and cleans up some deprecation in the pod_conditions_test.go

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Promote PodReadyToStartContainers condition to beta.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

- [KEP]: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/tree/master/keps/sig-node/3085-pod-conditions-for-starting-completition-of-sandbox-creation

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. labels Jul 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Please note that we're already in Test Freeze for the release-1.28 branch. This means every merged PR will be automatically fast-forwarded via the periodic ci-fast-forward job to the release branch of the upcoming v1.28.0 release.

Fast forwards are scheduled to happen every 6 hours, whereas the most recent run was: Fri Jul 28 16:11:31 UTC 2023.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/kubelet kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 28, 2023
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor Author

Just putting this up as its fresh in my head what is required for this KEP for 1.29.

@kannon92 kannon92 mentioned this pull request Jul 26, 2023
Open
20 tasks
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/test sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. labels Jul 28, 2023
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@bart0sh bart0sh added this to Triage in SIG Node PR Triage Jul 31, 2023
@swatisehgal
Copy link
Contributor

/triage accepted
/priority important-longterm
/assign @ddebroy
(as he is a contributor to this feature)

Please raise this with SIG node to ensure that this work is tracked for 1.29. 1.29 planning hasn't started yet but there is likely to be a discussion soon. Keep an eye on the SIG node agenda doc and the planning doc.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jul 31, 2023
@rphillips
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/assign @mrunalp

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: f0c2140a8bc8b2802135236f21ac5881fc5bb938

@kannon92 kannon92 changed the title Promote KEP-3085 to beta in 1.29 [KEP-3085] Promote PodReadyToStartContainers to beta in 1.29 Oct 6, 2023
@kannon92 kannon92 moved this from Needs Reviewer to Needs Approver in SIG Node PR Triage Oct 6, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 12, 2023
@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Oct 12, 2023

API constant lgtm, ping me when the feature and kubelet packages have node owner approval and I'll add approve for the API change

@liggitt liggitt self-assigned this Oct 12, 2023
@liggitt liggitt added this to API review completed, 1.29 in API Reviews Oct 12, 2023
@rphillips
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 582e34779ae8a698cd06e78846f2950726d129e3

@rphillips
Copy link
Member

/test unit

looks like a flake

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@rphillips: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cadvisor-e2e-kubernetes
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel
  • /test pull-kubernetes-coverage-unit
  • /test pull-kubernetes-dependencies
  • /test pull-kubernetes-dependencies-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-big-performance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-no-stage
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-http-connect
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-scale-performance-manual
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6
  • /test pull-kubernetes-integration
  • /test pull-kubernetes-integration-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-scale
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-typecheck
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit-go-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-update
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify-go-canary

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test check-dependency-stats
  • /test pull-ci-kubernetes-unit-windows
  • /test pull-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-eviction
  • /test pull-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-features
  • /test pull-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-hugepages
  • /test pull-crio-cgroupv1-node-e2e-resource-managers
  • /test pull-e2e-gce-cloud-provider-disabled
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-image-test
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only
  • /test pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ipv6-parallel
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv1-containerd-node-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv1-containerd-node-e2e-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv2-containerd-node-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv2-containerd-node-e2e-eviction
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv2-containerd-node-e2e-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cos-cgroupv2-containerd-node-e2e-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-crio-node-memoryqos-cgrpv2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-cross
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-autoscaling-hpa-cm
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-autoscaling-hpa-cpu
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-disk
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-disk-vmss
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-file
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-azure-file-vmss
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-conformance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows-alpha-feature-vpa
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows-master
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-capz-windows-serial-slow-hpa
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-containerd-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-ec2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-ec2-conformance
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-correctness
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-csi-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-device-plugin-gpu
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-kubelet-credential-provider
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-network-proxy-grpc
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-disruptive
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-slow
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-storage-snapshot
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-autoscaling
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ingress
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gci-gce-ipvs
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-inplace-pod-resize-containerd-main-v2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-dual-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipvs-dual-canary
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-kms
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-multizone
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kops-aws
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-storage-kind-disruptive
  • /test pull-kubernetes-e2e-ubuntu-gce-network-policies
  • /test pull-kubernetes-integration-eks
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kind-dra
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kind-json-logging
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kind-text-logging
  • /test pull-kubernetes-kubemark-e2e-gce-big
  • /test pull-kubernetes-linter-hints
  • /test pull-kubernetes-local-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-arm64-e2e-containerd-ec2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-arm64-e2e-containerd-serial-ec2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-arm64-ubuntu-serial-gce
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv1-evented-pleg-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv2-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-cgrpv2-e2e-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-e2e
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-crio-e2e-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-1-7-dra
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-ec2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-features-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-serial-ec2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-sidecar-containers
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-standalone-mode
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd-standalone-mode-all-alpha
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-crio-dra
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-credential-provider
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-containerd
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-containerd-alpha-features
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-containerd-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-containerd-sidecar-containers
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-cpu-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-cpu-manager-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-crio-cgroupv1
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-crio-cgroupv2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-hugepages
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-memory-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-pod-disruption-conditions
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-topology-manager
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-kubelet-serial-topology-manager-kubetest2
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-fedora
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-fedora-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-node-swap-ubuntu-serial
  • /test pull-kubernetes-unit-experimental
  • /test pull-kubernetes-verify-strict-lint
  • /test pull-publishing-bot-validate

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ga-only-parallel
  • pull-kubernetes-conformance-kind-ipv6-parallel
  • pull-kubernetes-dependencies
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-ec2
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-ec2-conformance
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-cos-alpha-features
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind
  • pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6
  • pull-kubernetes-integration
  • pull-kubernetes-linter-hints
  • pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd
  • pull-kubernetes-typecheck
  • pull-kubernetes-unit
  • pull-kubernetes-verify
  • pull-kubernetes-verify-strict-lint

In response to this:

/test unit

looks like a flake

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rphillips
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-unit

@kannon92
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liggitt when you get a chance, can you give final approval? It looks like we have all the necessary ones now.

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented Oct 12, 2023

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kannon92, liggitt, mrunalp

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8923c3c into kubernetes:master Oct 12, 2023
14 of 16 checks passed
SIG Node PR Triage automation moved this from Needs Approver to Done Oct 12, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.29 milestone Oct 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@mrunalp mrunalp mrunalp approved these changes

@andrewsykim andrewsykim Awaiting requested review from andrewsykim

@saad-ali saad-ali Awaiting requested review from saad-ali

@rphillips rphillips Awaiting requested review from rphillips

@ddebroy ddebroy Awaiting requested review from ddebroy

Assignees

@rphillips rphillips

@mrunalp mrunalp

@liggitt liggitt

@ddebroy ddebroy

Labels
api-review Categorizes an issue or PR as actively needing an API review. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/kubelet area/test cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/node Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
API Reviews
Status: API review completed, 1.29
SIG Node CI/Test Board
Archive-it
SIG Node CI/Test Board
Status: Done
SIG Node PR Triage
Done
Milestone
v1.29
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
9 participants
@kannon92 @k8s-ci-robot @swatisehgal @bart0sh @ndixita @rphillips @liggitt @mrunalp @ddebroy