Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

馃尡 Provide faster support for new k8s minor releases #9971

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 19, 2024
Merged

馃尡 Provide faster support for new k8s minor releases #9971

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 19, 2024

Conversation

fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini commented Jan 9, 2024 •
edited

What this PR does / why we need it:
Considering the maturity of the release process and the maturity of the process we are using to validate support for new Kubernetes releases, I would like to propose the introduction in our release schedule of a new "extra" patch release to be created approximately one week after a new Kubernetes minor release is available.

This will ensure the project will quickly provide official support for new Kubernetes releases to Cluster API users.

Additionally, this PR clarifies the 4-month cadence which we are de-facto using (mostly a cleanup of leftovers from previous versions).

/area release

/hold
For discussion in the next office hours meeting

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. area/release Issues or PRs related to releasing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Jan 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 9, 2024
sbueringer
sbueringer reviewed Jan 9, 2024
View reviewed changes
docs/release/release-cycle.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/release/release-cycle.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini requested review from chrischdi and sbueringer and removed request for elmiko and CecileRobertMichon January 9, 2024 16:02
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

+1 I think it would be great if we would allow our users to quickly pick up a new Kubernetes version with Cluster API!

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: af045fac8f8523cebddd1faeda7384e80a8d01b7

chrischdi
chrischdi reviewed Jan 10, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/cc @kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-release-team

@kubernetes-sigs kubernetes-sigs deleted a comment from k8s-ci-robot Jan 10, 2024
@cahillsf
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@cahillsf cahillsf mentioned this pull request Jan 10, 2024
Closed
CecileRobertMichon
CecileRobertMichon reviewed Jan 10, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 11, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

sbueringer commented Jan 12, 2024 •
edited

Looks good!

/lgtm

As it was brought up in office hours this week. Maybe lazy consensus until next week Friday and then merge it?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 15b58e9ac4a3187191754a8c430c2d13ebc47ae9

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

As it was brought up in office hours this week. Maybe lazy consensus until next week Friday and then merge it?

Make sense to me, I will give also another heads-up in office hours this week (two days before the deadline)

@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request Jan 16, 2024
Closed
14 tasks
@g-gaston
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member Author

As per CAPI office hours, lazy consensus expires Jan 19th

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/approve

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 19, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 11dc384 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jan 19, 2024
18 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.7 milestone Jan 19, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

sbueringer commented Jan 19, 2024 •
edited

I open a cherry-pick PR (#10024)

@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2024
Merged
@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini deleted the faster-support-for-k8s-releases branch January 22, 2024 12:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@thefirstofthe300 thefirstofthe300 thefirstofthe300 left review comments

@sbueringer sbueringer Awaiting requested review from sbueringer

@cahillsf cahillsf Awaiting requested review from cahillsf

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon Awaiting requested review from CecileRobertMichon

@chrischdi chrischdi Awaiting requested review from chrischdi

Assignees

@chrischdi chrischdi

@sbueringer sbueringer

@g-gaston g-gaston

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon

@cahillsf cahillsf

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release Issues or PRs related to releasing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.7
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
8 participants
@fabriziopandini @sbueringer @k8s-ci-robot @cahillsf @g-gaston @chrischdi @thefirstofthe300 @CecileRobertMichon