馃尡 Allow backport for experimental features #8293
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
cncf-cla: yes
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 8840ba6ea3576b749cc0344a9c6c33df87ce31a4
|
|
/lgtm Sounds good to me! |
|
discussed this today in the community meeting, would be nice to start practicing this for our next release. no rush on getting this merged though. if no objections by next friday, we will merge this. |
|
Not super important but I assume this means next week Friday? (cc @killianmuldoon @fabriziopandini given recent discussion around this phrase 馃槀) |
fabriziopandini
force-pushed
the
allow-backport-for-experimental-features
branch
from
0a40194
to
6f31397
Compare
|
The lazy consensus deadline expired |
|
@fabriziopandini: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.4 in a new PR and assign it to you. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
|
@fabriziopandini: new pull request created: #8441 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/area release |
|
/area documentation |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Proposing a small amendment to backport policy in order to allow a little bit of more flexibility for experimental features