Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Implement controller paused condition for core CAPI resources #10364

Draft
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

theobarberbany
Copy link

@theobarberbany theobarberbany commented Apr 2, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR Adds the Paused condition, and tests to all of the core CAPI resources.

Fixes #10130

/area area/provider/core

This change updates the types to add a new PausedCondition.

It also adds two reasons: ResourcePausedReason, and
ResourceNotPausedReason

This is to enable controllers to report when a resource is paused. This
allows an administrator to work with confidence on a paused object.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Apr 2, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @theobarberbany!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign enxebre for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @theobarberbany. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 2, 2024
@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

@theobarberbany PTAL comments on the original issue

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 8, 2024
@theobarberbany theobarberbany force-pushed the pausing-machine-controller branch 2 times, most recently from f040e82 to e369071 Compare April 9, 2024 18:19
@theobarberbany
Copy link
Author

/area area/provider/core

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@theobarberbany: The label(s) area/area/provider/core cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

/area area/provider/core

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@theobarberbany
Copy link
Author

/area provider/core

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/provider/core Issues or PRs related to the core provider and removed do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label labels Apr 26, 2024
@theobarberbany theobarberbany changed the title WIP: Machine controller paused condition WIP: Implement controller paused condition for core CAPI resources Apr 26, 2024
This change updates the machine controller to set the paused condition
based on if the cluster or machine resource is paused.
This change updates the cluster controller to set the paused condition
based on if the cluster is paused.
This change updates the machine set controller to set the paused condition
based on if the cluster or machine set resource is paused.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 30, 2024
This change updates the machine health check controller to set the paused condition
based on if the cluster or machine health check is paused.
@theobarberbany theobarberbany force-pushed the pausing-machine-controller branch 2 times, most recently from 1975743 to 660227d Compare May 1, 2024 12:59
This change updates the machine deployment controller to set the paused condition
based on if the cluster or machine deployment has the paused annotations.
@theobarberbany theobarberbany force-pushed the pausing-machine-controller branch 2 times, most recently from 97d9b36 to 3624ef3 Compare May 8, 2024 12:45
@theobarberbany
Copy link
Author

Waiting on: #10550 in order to update the condition with new polarity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/provider/core Issues or PRs related to the core provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consistent reporting of paused resources
3 participants