Deprecate ace-editor
#681
Merged
Deprecate ace-editor
#681
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
basil
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2023
6 tasks
rsandell
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2023
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As of https://github.com/jenkinsci/workflow-cps-plugin/releases/tag/3611.v201b_d9f9eb_f7, Pipeline: Groovy Plugin no longer depends on
ace-editor, making it a library plugin without dependents that can safely be uninstalled by everyone who's keeping their Jenkins up to date.This is the last plugin in https://github.com/jenkinsci/js-libs/ to be deprecated (after #679 and #677); perhaps we can consider archiving this repo?
Maintainers @batmat @rsandell to approve.
Thanks @basil for making this possible.