-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support mixed INT8
+ FP16
in one model
#1798
Conversation
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
⚡ Required checks status: All passing 🟢Groups summary🟢 Code Scan Tests workflow
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 Model Tests 3x workflow
These checks are required after the changes to 🟢 Unit Tests 3x-PyTorch workflow
These checks are required after the changes to Thank you for your contribution! 💜
|
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Shall we add logger.info to teach user that ipex doesn't support fp16? |
Thanks for your suggestions, will refine it by a separate PR. |
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: yiliu30 <yi4.liu@intel.com>
Type of Change
feature
API changed or not
Description
linear
intofp16
Usage
Expected Behavior & Potential Risk
How has this PR been tested?
Pre-CI
Some extension test later.
Dependency Change?
expecttest