Proof-of-concept for MooseX::Role::Parameterized support #23
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
I'm very keen on this idea. There are a couple of times that I've thought needing them myself, but it always turned out (for me) to be looking at the problem wrong. However, I know many others would like this idea. If I get some time, I'll consider moving this to a separate branch and poking around at it. Cheers, |
autarch
force-pushed
the
master
branch
2 times, most recently
from
ec411e8
to
3f35010
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
How would you feel about adding support for MooseX::Role::Parameterized? Maybe even like below? MRP support is the only show-stopper that prevents me from switching most of our test infrastructure over from Test::Able to Test::Class::Mose, so I am more than willing to curate this feature until it is release ready.
Most likely t/tags.t is not the best place to test that feature, but for a proof of concept this was the easiest to pull of. Please also ignore the white-space changes in this file, in the unlikely event you want to merge this feature as-is, I will correct those to match the projects style.