Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix lightsail bucket resource access partition pre-check #29706

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2023

Conversation

jar-b
Copy link
Member

@jar-b jar-b commented Feb 28, 2023

Description

Fixing linter finding introduced when #29460 was merged with main.

Relations

Relates #29460

Output from Acceptance Testing

$ make testacc TESTARGS='-run=TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess' PKG=lightsail
==> Checking that code complies with gofmt requirements...
TF_ACC=1 go test ./internal/service/lightsail/... -v -count 1 -parallel 20  -run=TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess -timeout 180m
=== RUN   TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess_basic
=== PAUSE TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess_basic
=== RUN   TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess_disappears
=== PAUSE TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess_disappears
=== CONT  TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess_basic
=== CONT  TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess_disappears
--- PASS: TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess_disappears (63.62s)
--- PASS: TestAccLightsailBucketResourceAccess_basic (66.16s)
PASS
ok      github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-aws/internal/service/lightsail  69.228s

@github-actions
Copy link

Community Note

Voting for Prioritization

  • Please vote on this pull request by adding a 👍 reaction to the original post to help the community and maintainers prioritize this pull request.
  • Please see our prioritization guide for information on how we prioritize.
  • Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for issue followers and do not help prioritize the request.

For Submitters

  • Review the contribution guide relating to the type of change you are making to ensure all of the necessary steps have been taken.
  • For new resources and data sources, use skaff to generate scaffolding with comments detailing common expectations.
  • Whether or not the branch has been rebased will not impact prioritization, but doing so is always a welcome surprise.

@github-actions github-actions bot added service/lightsail Issues and PRs that pertain to the lightsail service. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure. size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. labels Feb 28, 2023
@jar-b jar-b merged commit 90ed865 into main Feb 28, 2023
@jar-b jar-b deleted the b-fix-lightsail-partition-check branch February 28, 2023 15:53
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v4.57.0 milestone Feb 28, 2023
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 3, 2023

This functionality has been released in v4.57.0 of the Terraform AWS Provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading.

For further feature requests or bug reports with this functionality, please create a new GitHub issue following the template. Thank you!

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Apr 4, 2023

I'm going to lock this pull request because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.
If you have found a problem that seems related to this change, please open a new issue and complete the issue template so we can capture all the details necessary to investigate further.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 4, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
service/lightsail Issues and PRs that pertain to the lightsail service. size/XS Managed by automation to categorize the size of a PR. tests PRs: expanded test coverage. Issues: expanded coverage, enhancements to test infrastructure.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant