Update the title to display summary instead of id

[zahraaalizadeh]

Prior to this change, in the vulnerability page, id of the vulnerability was displayed as title.

This change updates the title to display the human readable summary for the title, and adds ID as an data description.

resolves #2078

example 1 - Before:

After:

Example 2 - Before:

After:

[oliverchang]

Thanks! Could we instead add the summary to the main part of the page, above "details" ?

IMO the title should remain the vulnerability ID. summary can get pretty long.

[zahraaalizadeh]

@oliverchang Sometimes details include a Summary section too. Adding a field like Summary or Brief summary might seem duplicated? WDYT?

[oliverchang]

@oliverchang Sometimes details include a Summary section too. Adding a field like Summary or Brief summary might seem duplicated? WDYT?

I think that's OK. We should accurately render what's in the source JSON.

[zahraaalizadeh]

@oliverchang I updated it as per suggestion. Now there's a Summary field that comes before Details.

[another-rex]

It is starting to look a bit busy, can you add a gap between summary and the Modified field above it (similar to the gap between references and details). This way we have 3 mini sections separated with some padding:

• the metadata
• the text (summary and description)
• references

Also, for some entries summary is empty, in those cases I think we should just hide the summary field (though that might be confusing, maybe a greyed out [none] or something similar could be better)

[zahraaalizadeh]

@another-rex Thanks for your suggestions, I applied them in dc46044 and
566aaec.

[another-rex]

/gcbrun

[hogo6002]

It seems not all entries have summary field. Example: https://test.osv.dev/vulnerability/CVE-2024-34397

[andrewpollock]

It seems not all entries have summary field

This is definitely to be expected for CVEs, which don't have clean correlation between OSV's summary versus details fields. I think the current treatment isn't too bad. An improvement would be to omit the Summary field entirely from the per-vulnerability page.

The is deferring to the full record in the absence of a summary...

[zahraaalizadeh]

@hogo6002 Displaying the summary as grayout [none] is intentional based on this comment.

Please let me know if you think we could handle it better in the vulnerability page.

[andrewpollock]

An improvement would be to omit the Summary field entirely from the per-vulnerability page.

Apologies, that was a poorly formed statement... I meant to say it could be omitted when it is empty/undefined, but that inconsistency could also be visually jarring and may be worse than what we have now.