Improve Unit-Tests Coverage and CI Workflows #79
Conversation
gaby
requested review from
sixcolors,
ReneWerner87 and
efectn
and removed request for
a team
WalkthroughThe recent modifications streamline and enhance the development workflow for a Go project, focusing on better code quality and performance. Updates include the adoption of Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once you merge this PR into your default branch, you're all set! Codecov will compare coverage reports and display results in all future pull requests. Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Status
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.mod
Files selected for processing (20)
- .github/workflows/benchmark.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/linter.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- .golangci.yml (1 hunks)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- bytes_test.go (1 hunks)
- byteseq_test.go (2 hunks)
- common.go (2 hunks)
- common_test.go (7 hunks)
- convert.go (1 hunks)
- convert_test.go (6 hunks)
- file.go (7 hunks)
- file_test.go (5 hunks)
- http_test.go (3 hunks)
- ips.go (1 hunks)
- ips_test.go (3 hunks)
- time_test.go (2 hunks)
- xml_test.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Makefile
Additional Context Used
GitHub Check Runs (1)
codecov/patch success (3)
file.go: [warning] 57-57: file.go#L57
Added line #L57 was not covered by tests
file.go: [warning] 76-76: file.go#L76
Added line #L76 was not covered by tests
file.go: [warning] 82-82: file.go#L82
Added line #L82 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (40)
.gitignore (1)
14-14: Addingcoverage.htmlto.gitignoreis a good practice to avoid committing generated files. Well done..github/workflows/linter.yml (4)
1-1: Changing the workflow name togolangci-lintclarifies its purpose. Good choice.
6-11: Updating path configurations to include all files except those indocsand Markdown files is a sensible approach to trigger the workflow only on meaningful changes.Also applies to: 13-16
18-24: Adding permissions for content, pull requests, and checks access is a good security practice, ensuring the workflow has only the necessary permissions.
27-43: Adjusting the job setup to include the latest Go version and specifying thegolangci-lintversion ensures consistency with the project's environment. Remember to keep these versions updated as part of regular maintenance..github/workflows/test.yml (3)
21-22: Updating the Go versions and addingmacos-14to the testing matrix ensures compatibility across the latest platforms and Go versions. This is a proactive approach to maintaining the project.
33-40: Addinggotestsumfor test execution and adjusting test commands enhances the readability and utility of test outputs. This change improves the developer experience by providing more structured test results.
42-49: Uploading coverage reports to Codecov for specific platforms and Go versions is a great way to track test coverage over time. Ensure that theCODECOV_TOKENis securely stored and access is limited.time_test.go (2)
10-13: Changing the assertion method incheckTimeStamptorequire.Truewith a condition for time buffer is a practical approach to handle potential timing discrepancies in tests.
34-65: Adding assertions and timer resets in benchmark functions is a good practice. It ensures the benchmarks are accurately measuring the intended operations. Remember to review the benchmark results for any significant changes..github/workflows/benchmark.yml (3)
6-16: Updating paths configuration to trigger the workflow on meaningful changes is a good practice. It avoids unnecessary runs on documentation updates.
22-29: Updating the Go version in the setup step ensures benchmarks are run against the current project environment. Consistency between the project environment and benchmarking environment is crucial.
31-52: Adjusting steps for running benchmarks, caching, and saving benchmark results aligns with best practices for performance testing. Using actions for caching and benchmark comparison helps in tracking performance over time.file_test.go (3)
4-4: Adding thefmtpackage import to support error formatting in new test functions is necessary. Good attention to detail.
56-62: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [40-73]
Renaming
neededResultstoexpectedResultsand adjusting assertion parameters improves readability and clarity in test cases. Consistent naming conventions enhance the maintainability of test code.
75-96: AddingTest_Walk_ErrorandTest_ReadFile_Errorfunctions to test error cases is an excellent practice. It ensures robust error handling and coverage of edge cases in the code.byteseq_test.go (1)
11-35: AddingTest_EqualFoldto test case-insensitive comparisons of string and byte slices is a valuable addition. It covers various cases and usesrequire.Equalfor assertions, ensuring the function behaves as expected.bytes_test.go (2)
24-32: AddingTest_ToUpperBytesto test theToUpperBytesfunction with multiple cases is a good practice. It ensures the function works as expected across a variety of inputs.
38-49: Refactoring benchmark functions to userequire.Truefor comparison instead ofrequire.Equalis appropriate. However, ensure that the benchmarks are focused on measuring performance rather than correctness, which should be covered by unit tests.ips.go (1)
3-5: The change to a multi-line import block enhances readability and maintainability.file.go (4)
4-4: Adding theerrorspackage to utilizeerrors.Isfor error handling is a good practice for more precise error comparison.
22-22: RenamingwalktowalkInternalimproves clarity by indicating it's an internal helper function.
57-57: Usingerrors.Isfor error comparison is a best practice, enhancing the robustness of error handling.
57-57: Ensure new error handling logic is covered by tests.Also applies to: 76-76, 82-82
xml_test.go (2)
72-73: Updating assertions torequire.NoErrorandrequire.Lenimproves clarity and specificity in test expectations.
79-99: Adding benchmark functions for XML encoding and decoding is valuable for tracking performance regressions or improvements.Also applies to: 101-121, 123-138
convert.go (1)
139-146: The added comments clarify why error checking is omitted, enhancing code readability and maintainability.http_test.go (2)
96-97: Adding new test cases improves coverage and ensures the function handles edge cases correctly.
103-103: Removing unnecessary assignments in benchmark functions simplifies the code and may slightly improve benchmark accuracy.Also applies to: 109-109, 145-145, 150-150
ips_test.go (1)
17-41: Updating assertions torequire.Trueandrequire.Falseand adding new test cases for IPv6 addresses enhance test clarity and coverage.Also applies to: 46-76
common_test.go (3)
10-11: Adding imports fornetandospackages supports the new test functions added in this file.
29-30: Refactoring assertions to userequire.Lenandrequire.NotEqualimproves the clarity and specificity of test expectations.Also applies to: 54-55
100-111: Adding new test functionsTest_GetArgumentandTest_IncrementIPRangeincreases test coverage and ensures functionality correctness.Also applies to: 113-134
common.go (1)
55-73: Renaming the variableuuidto_uuidin theUUIDfunction improves clarity by distinguishing it from theuuidpackage.README.md (1)
5-7: LGTM! The addition of the Codecov badge and reordering of the Discord badge are appropriate updates.convert_test.go (4)
15-30: LGTM! The modernization to[]anyand the addition ofMyStringerandCustomTypefor testing purposes are well-implemented.
47-60: > 📝 NOTEThis review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [33-57]
LGTM! The updates to
dataTypeExamplesand theToStringtest cases enhance the test coverage by including a wider variety of data types.Also applies to: 82-126
161-197: LGTM! The comprehensive tests forCopyBytesandByteSizefunctions are well-designed to ensure correctness and robustness.
263-296: LGTM! The updates to benchmarks forUnsafeBytesandUnsafeStringprovide valuable insights into performance comparisons..golangci.yml (1)
1-383: Consider addressing the TODO comments throughout the.golangci.ymlconfiguration to further refine linting practices and ensure alignment with best practices.
gaby
changed the title
77.7%to94.6%. An improvement of21%54 teststo91 testsApple-M14platformMakefileto ease development/testingFixes #68