feat: very good analysis

[jamesblasco]

Regarding very_good_analysis, I disabled two rules that were used extensively in the library

• library_private_types_in_public_api. A private method is returned in two functions
  

  mocktail/packages/mocktail/lib/src/mocktail.dart

  Line 334 in 447575a

  _Verify get verify => _makeVerify(false);

• parameter_assignments. I not sure how to rename the inner variables vs the method parameters
  

  mocktail/packages/mocktail/lib/src/mocktail.dart

  Lines 26 to 32 in 447575a

  	Expectation<dynamic> _exceptionResponse(
  	void Function(Invocation)? exceptionBuilder,
  	) {
  	exceptionBuilder ??= (invocation) {
  	throw MissingStubError(invocation);
  	};
  	return Expectation<dynamic>.allInvocations(exceptionBuilder);

Status

IN DEVELOPMENT

Breaking Changes

NO

Description

Type of Change

• ✨ New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• 🛠️ Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• ❌ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• 🧹 Code refactor
• ✅ Build configuration change
• 📝 Documentation
• 🗑️ Chore

[felangel]

@jamesblasco just merged #150 if you have some time are you able to resolve the merge conflicts? Thanks!

[felangel]

Closing since this was addressed by #203