chore(op-proposer): Update Proposer Description

[refcell]

Description

Small pr to update the op-proposer binary application description to be generic over the destination of L2 Output submission. Since, post-fault proof activation, outputs will be submitted to the DisputeGameFactory as opposed to the L2OutputOracle.

[refcell]

• chore(op-proposer): Update Proposer Description #9916 👈
• develop

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Join @refcell and the rest of your teammates on Graphite

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent update to the op-proposer application involves a terminology refinement, shifting its description to more accurately reflect its functionality. It now focuses on generating and proposing L2 Outputs, rather than merely submitting them to a specific contract. This change also includes a minor adjustment in terminology usage, enhancing clarity by specifying it as an "L2 Output Submitter".

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
op-proposer/cmd/main.go	Updated application description from "Service for generating and submitting L2 Output checkpoints to the L2OutputOracle contract" to "Service for generating and proposing L2 Outputs". Adjusted terminology from "L2Output Submitter" to "L2 Output Submitter".

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

---

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

[ajsutton]

LGTM. Could you also check that any flags around using the dispute game aren't marked as experimental etc now too please? (they may be in a good place already)