feat: add loadESLint api #18088
Closed
feat: add loadESLint api #18088
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
eslint-github-bot
bot
added
breaking
✅ Deploy Preview for docs-eslint canceled.
|
aladdin-add
changed the title
aladdin-add
force-pushed
the
issue18075
branch
from
85825c1
to
80c048c
Compare
aladdin-add
force-pushed
the
issue18075
branch
from
89029b4
to
c0d0cb6
Compare
|
We need to wait for feedback on #18075 before proceeding. |
1 task
|
Closing this in favor of #18097 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #18075
Prerequisites checklist
What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)
[ ] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofix to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ x] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:
What changes did you make? (Give an overview)
Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?