Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Add suggestions for no-prototype-builtins #17677
feat: Add suggestions for no-prototype-builtins #17677
Changes from 1 commit
3486e20
3c12598
390c9b3
07bd874
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be better not to provide the suggestion in cases like this (
node.callee
is a ChainExpression).This is a possible error reported by no-unsafe-optional-chaining and should be fixed manually.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks I stopped giving the suggestion when
node.callee.type === "ChainExpression"
. I do wonder whether we should remove theconst callee = astUtils.skipChainExpression(node.callee);
above and just not report any no-prototype-builtins for(foo?.hasOwnProperty)('bar')
in favor of no-unsafe-optional-chaining.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's fine for both rules to report this code as those are two different problems.