Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Update PR review process #18233

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Mar 30, 2024
Merged

docs: Update PR review process #18233

merged 6 commits into from Mar 30, 2024

Conversation

nzakas
Copy link
Member

@nzakas nzakas commented Mar 26, 2024

Prerequisites checklist

What is the purpose of this pull request? (put an "X" next to an item)

[x] Documentation update
[ ] Bug fix (template)
[ ] New rule (template)
[ ] Changes an existing rule (template)
[ ] Add autofix to a rule
[ ] Add a CLI option
[ ] Add something to the core
[ ] Other, please explain:

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

Updated the pull request review process to better reflect what we actually do and include how to use the two new columns in the triage board.

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Does this process make sense?

@nzakas nzakas requested a review from a team as a code owner March 26, 2024 18:44
@eslint-github-bot eslint-github-bot bot added the documentation Relates to ESLint's documentation label Mar 26, 2024
Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Deploy Preview for docs-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 07ede6e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/docs-eslint/deploys/66070ce664659f000870f9d8
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-18233--docs-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@amareshsm amareshsm added the accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion label Mar 26, 2024
nzakas and others added 3 commits March 26, 2024 13:20
Co-authored-by: Amaresh  S M  <amareshsm13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Amaresh  S M  <amareshsm13@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Amaresh  S M  <amareshsm13@gmail.com>
mdjermanovic
mdjermanovic previously approved these changes Mar 26, 2024
Copy link
Member

@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! Since this is about our processes, I'll leave it open for a few days for other team members to review.

Tanujkanti4441
Tanujkanti4441 previously approved these changes Mar 27, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Tanujkanti4441 Tanujkanti4441 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

amareshsm
amareshsm previously approved these changes Mar 28, 2024
Copy link
Member

@amareshsm amareshsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, Leaving this open for other's review/opinions.

fasttime
fasttime previously approved these changes Mar 28, 2024

If the pull request does not have a related issue, then it should be moved through the normal [triage process for issues](./manage-issues) to be marked as accepted. Once accepted, move the pull request to the "Implementing" column.

If the pull request does have a related issue, then move the pull request to the "Implementing" column.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Normally I moved to "Implementing" only if the corresponding issue has been accepted, otherwise I moved to "evaluating". This needs to change?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's a good point. @mdjermanovic @fasttime what do you think?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, "evaluating" makes more sense than "implementing" when the corresponding issue hasn't been accepted yet.

Copy link
Member

@mdjermanovic mdjermanovic left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
accepted There is consensus among the team that this change meets the criteria for inclusion documentation Relates to ESLint's documentation
Projects
Status: Complete
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants