Adiciona ruff check #116
Closed
Adiciona ruff check #116
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
|
Obrigado por isso @mmaachado Acredito que seu editor tenha algum formatador de toml. Pois foram enviadas muitas modificações que não são feretentes exatamente ao pr |
|
é o vs code que uso na máquina do trabalho, vou procurar fazer as alterações no emacs da minha máquina pessoal :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Para rodar o ruff futuramente será necessário usar o argumento
ruff check <path>, ou segundo esse PR na documentação da release v0.3.3 do ruff, apenas oruff checkbastaria para executar o linter.Este PR atualiza a aula 01.md e todos os arquivos pyproject.toml nos códigos das aulas.