Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Regression | Revert PR #2281 SNIProxy code change #2395

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

JRahnama
Copy link
Member

@JRahnama JRahnama commented Mar 8, 2024

This PR reverts back the code change from #2281 to address regression in v5.2.0

@JRahnama JRahnama added the 💥 Regression Regression introduced from earlier PRs label Mar 8, 2024
@JRahnama JRahnama added this to the 6.0-preview1 milestone Mar 8, 2024
Co-authored-by: David Engel <dengel1012@gmail.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.62%. Comparing base (769b982) to head (19dd6e4).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2395      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.69%   72.62%   -0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         310      310              
  Lines       61885    61885              
==========================================
- Hits        44987    44947      -40     
- Misses      16898    16938      +40     
Flag Coverage Δ
addons 92.88% <ø> (ø)
netcore 76.79% <100.00%> (-0.12%) ⬇️
netfx 70.21% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@DavoudEshtehari
Copy link
Member

Can you link the related issues for the record?

@ErikEJ
Copy link
Contributor

ErikEJ commented Mar 11, 2024

Wonder if it would be possible to add a test to prevent this from regressing again?

@JRahnama
Copy link
Member Author

Wonder if it would be possible to add a test to prevent this from regressing again?

I was thinking the same. I compared it with SDS and will start by adding some tests. However, I need to understand the reason behind #2394 first. It seems the underlying cause of that issue might be a bit different.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
💥 Regression Regression introduced from earlier PRs
Projects
SqlClient v6.0
Awaiting triage
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants