Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Async compatible redirect panel #1976

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Aug 6, 2024

Conversation

salty-ivy
Copy link
Member

@salty-ivy salty-ivy commented Jul 31, 2024

Description

async compatible RedirectsPanel.

Checklist:

  • I have added the relevant tests for this change.
  • I have added an item to the Pending section of docs/changes.rst.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@salty-ivy salty-ivy changed the title Add a new async aprocess_request method as common pattern in base panel class. Async compatible redirect panel Aug 3, 2024
Comment on lines 41 to 43
response = super().process_request(request)
if iscoroutine(response):
return self.aprocess_request(request)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This flow will call super().process_request twice. We probably want to avoid that. I have some ideas, but none that I know are great. What do you think?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

since aprocess_request is exclusive to RedirectsPanel

  1. we can pass response from process_request in aprocess_request as an argument.
  2. or else we change the check from coroutine to checking request being an instance ASGIRequest.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My preference is option 1

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think 2. won't work either : )

@salty-ivy salty-ivy marked this pull request as ready for review August 4, 2024 06:30
@salty-ivy salty-ivy requested a review from tim-schilling August 4, 2024 06:30
@tim-schilling
Copy link
Member

Looks good! Thanks for working with me to arrive at this solution.

@tim-schilling tim-schilling merged commit 405f9f2 into django-commons:main Aug 6, 2024
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants