Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add explicit items()/keys()/values() methods #267

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 26, 2023

Conversation

corenting
Copy link
Owner

Just reapplied #265 with:

  • More performance tests to test the three impacted methods
  • Formatting fixes

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #267 (792116c) into master (b205f6e) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #267   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           49        55    +6     
=========================================
+ Hits            49        55    +6     
Flag Coverage Δ
3.12.0-rc.1 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
immutabledict/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@corenting corenting merged commit 88c7ddd into master Sep 26, 2023
9 checks passed
@corenting corenting deleted the fixes/dict-view-speedup branch September 26, 2023 11:44
@matthiasdiener
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @corenting !

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants