Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add missing cjs entry in package #3967

Conversation

frantic1048
Copy link
Contributor

Follow up #3963, fixes the missing cjs entry for @commitlint/cz-commitlint

#3963 (comment)

Copy link

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

@frantic1048 frantic1048 marked this pull request as draft March 11, 2024 03:30
@frantic1048
Copy link
Contributor Author

The package is ok for CJS consumer now, tested on local repo. cc @JounQin @escapedcat

ref: https://ci.codesandbox.io/status/conventional-changelog/commitlint/pr/3967/builds/482129

npm notice package: @commitlint/cz-commitlint@19.0.3
npm notice === Tarball Contents === 
npm notice 1.6kB README.md                                  
npm notice 164B  index.cjs                                  
npm notice 464B  lib/index.d.ts                             
npm notice 372B  lib/index.d.ts.map                         
npm notice 451B  lib/index.js                               
npm notice 407B  lib/index.js.map                           
npm notice 335B  lib/Process.d.ts                           
npm notice 390B  lib/Process.d.ts.map                       
npm notice 948B  lib/Process.js                             

@frantic1048 frantic1048 marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2024 03:34
@escapedcat escapedcat merged commit 9cea6fd into conventional-changelog:master Mar 11, 2024
7 checks passed
@escapedcat
Copy link
Member

https://github.com/conventional-changelog/commitlint/releases/tag/v19.1.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants