Ignore non-abstract class attributes when enforcing B024 #11210
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
| code | total | + violation | - violation | + fix | - fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B024 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Linter (preview)
ℹ️ ecosystem check detected linter changes. (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes in 1 projects; 43 projects unchanged)
DisnakeDev/disnake (+1 -0 violations, +0 -0 fixes)
ruff check --no-cache --exit-zero --ignore RUF9 --output-format concise --preview
+ disnake/app_commands.py:468:7: B024 `ApplicationCommand` is an abstract base class, but it has no abstract methods
Changes by rule (1 rules affected)
| code | total | + violation | - violation | + fix | - fix |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B024 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
AlexWaygood
approved these changes
Apr 30, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
I think the check included here does make sense, but I don't see why we would allow it if a value is provided for the attribute -- since, in that case, isn't it not abstract?
Closes: #11208.