Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[refurb] Advoid operator.itemgetter suggestion for single-item tuple #11095

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 23, 2024

Conversation

charliermarsh
Copy link
Member

Summary

The operator.itemgetter behavior changes where there's more than one argument, such that operator.itemgetter(0) yields r[0], rather than (r[0],).

Closes #11075.

@charliermarsh charliermarsh added the bug Something isn't working label Apr 23, 2024
@charliermarsh charliermarsh enabled auto-merge (squash) April 23, 2024 00:12
@charliermarsh charliermarsh merged commit 925c7f8 into main Apr 23, 2024
17 checks passed
@charliermarsh charliermarsh deleted the charlie/furb branch April 23, 2024 00:20
Copy link
Contributor

ruff-ecosystem results

Linter (stable)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Linter (preview)

✅ ecosystem check detected no linter changes.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FURB118 bug: incorrectly replaces 1 element tuple lambdas with itemgetter
1 participant