-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
reverse state proof siblings #13284
Merged
Merged
reverse state proof siblings #13284
+103
−87
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Base automatically changed from
0509-alden-slice-node
to
0514-alden-revert-expected-tps
May 15, 2024 04:36
This was referenced May 15, 2024
This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking. |
msmouse
force-pushed
the
0514-alden-sibling-rev
branch
from
May 15, 2024 04:53
172be93
to
1824e1c
Compare
msmouse
force-pushed
the
0514-alden-sibling-rev
branch
3 times, most recently
from
May 15, 2024 20:40
30683ca
to
fb462d7
Compare
msmouse
added
the
CICD:run-execution-performance-full-test
Run execution performance test (full version)
label
May 15, 2024
msmouse
force-pushed
the
0514-alden-sibling-rev
branch
from
May 15, 2024 22:26
fb462d7
to
cf3b0b9
Compare
Our implementation outputs the new order natually without the need for reversing. Lucky that we didn't expose the state proof to outside of the node The range proof unfortunately is already exposed, so not gonna be changed.
msmouse
force-pushed
the
0514-alden-sibling-rev
branch
from
May 15, 2024 22:40
cf3b0b9
to
83c00f6
Compare
areshand
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
zekun000
approved these changes
May 16, 2024
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
✅ Forge suite
|
✅ Forge suite
|
✅ Forge suite
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Our implementation outputs the new order natually without the need for
reversing.
Lucky that we didn't expose the state proof to outside of the node
The range proof unfortunately is already exposed, so not gonna be
changed.
Type of Change
Which Components or Systems Does This Change Impact?
How Has This Been Tested?
unit tests updated.
checked code as far as I can, and I don't think the proof is exposed anywhere, including db backups.
Key Areas to Review
Checklist