[PR #7821/366ba40f backport][3.9] Only check origin if insecure scheme and there are origins to treat as secure, in CookieJar.filter_cookies()

[patchback]

This is a backport of PR #7821 as merged into master (366ba40).

What do these changes do?

Only check origin if insecure scheme and there are origins to treat as secure, in CookieJar.filter_cookies().

The change was made because yarl.URL.origin() is expensive. Should avoid calling it unconditionally.

Are there changes in behavior for the user?

No.

Related issue number

#7583
#7819 (comment)

Checklist

• I think the code is well written
• Unit tests for the changes exist
• Documentation reflects the changes
• If you provide code modification, please add yourself to CONTRIBUTORS.txt
  • The format is <Name> <Surname>.
  • Please keep alphabetical order, the file is sorted by names.
• Add a new news fragment into the CHANGES folder
  • name it <issue_id>.<type> for example (588.bugfix)
  • if you don't have an issue_id change it to the pr id after creating the pr
  • ensure type is one of the following:
    • .feature: Signifying a new feature.
    • .bugfix: Signifying a bug fix.
    • .doc: Signifying a documentation improvement.
    • .removal: Signifying a deprecation or removal of public API.
    • .misc: A ticket has been closed, but it is not of interest to users.
  • Make sure to use full sentences with correct case and punctuation, for example: "Fix issue with non-ascii contents in doctest text files."

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (3.9@9d498ca). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##             3.9    #7825   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage       ?   97.36%           
======================================
  Files          ?      107           
  Lines          ?    32331           
  Branches       ?     3829           
======================================
  Hits           ?    31478           
  Misses         ?      649           
  Partials       ?      204           

Flag	Coverage Δ
CI-GHA	97.27% <0.00%> (?)
OS-Linux	96.96% <0.00%> (?)
OS-Windows	94.50% <0.00%> (?)
OS-macOS	96.63% <0.00%> (?)
Py-3.10.11	94.41% <0.00%> (?)
Py-3.10.13	96.79% <0.00%> (?)
Py-3.11.6	96.46% <0.00%> (?)
Py-3.12.0	96.51% <0.00%> (?)
Py-3.8.10	94.38% <0.00%> (?)
Py-3.8.18	96.72% <0.00%> (?)
Py-3.9.13	94.39% <0.00%> (?)
Py-3.9.18	96.77% <0.00%> (?)
Py-pypy7.3.13	96.22% <0.00%> (?)
VM-macos	96.63% <0.00%> (?)
VM-ubuntu	96.96% <0.00%> (?)
VM-windows	94.50% <0.00%> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

📣 Codecov offers a browser extension for seamless coverage viewing on GitHub. Try it in Chrome or Firefox today!