Fixing paths for OSes #1101
Merged
Fixing paths for OSes #1101
+9
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dapirian
referenced
this pull request
in trunk-io/plugins
Mar 9, 2023
[](https://renovatebot.com) This PR contains the following updates: | Package | Type | Update | Change | |---|---|---|---| | [actions/cache](https://togithub.com/actions/cache) | action | minor | `v3.2.4` -> `v3.3.0` | | [github/codeql-action](https://togithub.com/github/codeql-action) | action | patch | `v2.2.3` -> `v2.2.5` | | [trunk-io/trunk-action](https://togithub.com/trunk-io/trunk-action) | action | patch | `v1.0.6` -> `v1.0.7` | --- ### Release Notes <details> <summary>actions/cache</summary> ### [`v3.3.0`](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/releases/tag/v3.3.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/compare/v3.2.6...v3.3.0) #### What's Changed - Bug: Permission is missing in cache delete example by [@​kotokaze](https://togithub.com/kotokaze) in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1123](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1123) - Add `lookup-only` option by [@​cdce8p](https://togithub.com/cdce8p) in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1041](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1041) #### New Contributors - [@​kotokaze](https://togithub.com/kotokaze) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1123](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1123) **Full Changelog**: actions/cache@v3...v3.3.0 ### [`v3.2.6`](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/releases/tag/v3.2.6) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/compare/v3.2.5...v3.2.6) ##### What's Changed - Updated branch in Force deletion of caches by [@​t-dedah](https://togithub.com/t-dedah) in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1108](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1108) - Fix zstd not being used after zstd version upgrade to 1.5.4 on hosted runners by [@​pdotl](https://togithub.com/pdotl) in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1118](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1118) **Full Changelog**: actions/cache@v3...v3.2.6 ### [`v3.2.5`](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/releases/tag/v3.2.5) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/compare/v3.2.4...v3.2.5) ##### What's Changed - Rewrite readmes by [@​jsoref](https://togithub.com/jsoref) in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1085](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1085) - Fixed typos and formatting in docs by [@​kotewar](https://togithub.com/kotewar) in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1076](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1076) - Fixing paths for OSes by [@​kotewar](https://togithub.com/kotewar) in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1101](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1101) - Release patch version update by [@​Phantsure](https://togithub.com/Phantsure) in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1105](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1105) ##### New Contributors - [@​jsoref](https://togithub.com/jsoref) made their first contribution in [https://github.com/actions/cache/pull/1085](https://togithub.com/actions/cache/pull/1085) **Full Changelog**: actions/cache@v3...v3.2.5 </details> <details> <summary>github/codeql-action</summary> ### [`v2.2.5`](https://togithub.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.2.4...v2.2.5) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.2.4...v2.2.5) ### [`v2.2.4`](https://togithub.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.2.3...v2.2.4) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/github/codeql-action/compare/v2.2.3...v2.2.4) </details> <details> <summary>trunk-io/trunk-action</summary> ### [`v1.0.7`](https://togithub.com/trunk-io/trunk-action/releases/tag/v1.0.7) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/trunk-io/trunk-action/compare/v1.0.6...v1.0.7) Introduce a caching-only mode, controlled via `check-mode: populate_cache_only`. </details> --- ### Configuration 📅 **Schedule**: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined). 🚦 **Automerge**: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied. ♻ **Rebasing**: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox. 👻 **Immortal**: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get [config help](https://togithub.com/renovatebot/renovate/discussions) if that's undesired. --- - [ ] <!-- rebase-check -->If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box --- This PR has been generated by [Mend Renovate](https://www.mend.io/free-developer-tools/renovate/). View repository job log [here](https://app.renovatebot.com/dashboard#github/trunk-io/plugins). <!--renovate-debug:eyJjcmVhdGVkSW5WZXIiOiIzNC4xNTkuMiIsInVwZGF0ZWRJblZlciI6IjM0LjE1OS4yIn0=--> Co-authored-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Dakshjain1
pushed a commit
to SvavaCapital/cache
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2024
](https://renovatebot.com){kind=link}
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixed readme view
Motivation and Context
Formatting issue
How Has This Been Tested?
Previewed the resulting doc
Screenshots (if appropriate):
Types of changes
Checklist: